Search for: "In Re: Amendment of Section 9 of the Internal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court" Results 1 - 20 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
9 History seems to be on the majority’s side, as one struggles to find a Supreme Court case that struck down a condemnation—either state or federal, so long as 2 the agency had a mere rational basis for its decision to condemn. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
 Amendments to section 11 of the ACA – In order to ensure speedy appointment of arbitrators, section 11 may be amended to provide that the appointment of arbitrator(s) under the section shall only be done by arbitral institution(s) designated by the Supreme Court (in case of international commercial arbitrations) or the High Court (in case of all other arbitrations) for such purpose,… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Shreve Ariail
Hasbajrami, the Supreme Court’s ruling in this area. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by James Petrila
The need for something like FISA was made clear as early as 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in the famous Keith Case that electronic collection in domestic security cases fell within the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement as set forth in Katz v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the following cases for the upcoming term. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch It is time to pick-up our consideration of Supreme Court patent cases for the 2022-2023 term. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
(Amended Opinion) U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, May 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden requests a declaratory judgment, pursuant to Judiciary Code Section 2201 and Bankruptcy Rule 7001(9), that her debts were discharged by operation of law on August 3, 2016, the date of her bankruptcy discharge, because they are not student loans excluded from discharge under Section 523(a)(8). [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Doe, 19-1108Issue: Whether the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s decision in NAACP v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Which court hears the removal case and under what procedures? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm by rainey Reitman
The judges who sit on this court are hand picked by the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, that's currently Justice Roberts. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]