Search for: "In Re: Amendments To The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (Notice)"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Informality of Compensation Procedure. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
The procedural posture is a little wonky because instead of an appellate brief, juvenile filed a motion for an evidentiary hearing (something he contends he didn’t get, but should’ve gotten, below). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
GIBSON, JR., individually, Respondents. 2nd District.D&O Insurance: FLORIDA APPEALS COURT REVERSES D&O SETTLEMENT-OFFER RULING, Arrowood Indem. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Kozlowski, 80 N.J. 378(1979); In re: Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381 (2002); Devaney v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
No. 5, No. 09-1936 In plaintiff's action against a county school district under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. section 1681(a), alleging that defendants knew that an elementary school teacher sexually harassed students at another county but allowed him to ob [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
Florida v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
8) a defendant's Fifth Amendment protections were violated; and 9) a decision to increase a sentence by two levels for an abuse of trust was error. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 6:28 pm
The specific question was whether courts evaluate both procedural and substantive unconscionability simultaneously in a balancing or sliding scale approach, or whether courts consider either procedural or substantive unconscionability independently and conclude their analysis if either one is lacking.In re Ginn-La St. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
The appellant, whose position we are supporting, is represented by Oscar Michelen (Cuomo LLC). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
The clarified standard for rule 12(b)(6) motions adopted here will apply to any amended complaint that the plaintiffs may file.Iannacchino v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Lipscomb, No. 07-1293 "Conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, possession of a gun in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and possession of a gun as a convicted felon is affirmed where: 1) defendant actively disowned any interest in any of the items seized thus he lack the expectation of privacy required to challenge the seizure of the crack cocaine and gun; 2) defendant failed to timely appeal magistrate judge's ruling regarding court's decision to… [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Florida, 05-8820 While Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Pepin, No. 06-1462 "In case where defendant awaits trial on charges eligible for the death penalty, order excluding evidence of post-mortem dismemberment of the victims is vacated as: 1) to the extent that the district court excluded evidence from the guilt phase solely because it was excluded at the penalty phase, it erred as a matter of law; and 2) to the extent that the court relies on Federal Rule of Evidence 403, to exclude all evidence as to post-mortem dismemberment, it was an… [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Appeals using this procedure become available when the taxpayer receives a “final Notice of Intent to Levy” or of “Notice of Lien,” if they file an appeal within 30 days of the notice. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
Florida to the case. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Circuit Court, 4th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Duval County. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:41 pm
The Middle District of Florida recently closed an action in which Adam Kazal sued Price and moved in an “emergency ex parte application” for leave to depose Price on less than a week’s notice. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
Davi, No. 05-20803 An order enjoining California and Florida from applying their licensing and regulatory requirements on a Texas-based real estate broker is reversed and dismissed where: 1) personal jurisdiction over California did not arise from merely having sent cease and desist orders to the Texas Real Estate Commission; and 2) personal jurisdiction over Florida did not arise from the state's contact with the Texas Attorney General's Office in order to obtain… [read post]
