Search for: "In Re: Amendments To The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (Notice)" Results 81 - 100 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Spencer, No. 07-40593 "A decision amending a 1995 judgment sentencing defendant for carjacking, resulting in an increase to the amount of restitution owed, is affirmed where: 1) under a reasonable reading of the relevant rules and case law, the district court's amendment amounted to a clerical revision that did not substantively alter defendant's sentence; and 2) thus, the time limitation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 was… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
It is the Louisiana Code of Judicial Conduct that sets forth the state’s rules and procedures for allowing cameras in to cover judicial proceedings. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
Maples involves “whether a failure to satisfy a state procedural rule in a criminal case could be excused if the convicted individual was blameness for the failure, and the state had some role in the default. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Castro, 540 U.S. 375 (2003); and 2) although no notice of the recharacterization would have been required under the rules set out in US v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” In re Tyrone Noling, 2011 U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Page, No. 06-3800 A conviction for conspiracy to import cocaine and marijuana is affirmed over a claim that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(G) by not informing defendant of, and making sure he understood, the nature of the charge to which he pled guilty. . [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Holloway, No. 05-2229 Conviction for possession of ammunition by a felon is affirmed where the district court correctly denied defendant's motion to suppress since the defendant was not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes until after he fled from officers. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Abad, No. 06-0338 Conviction for armed robbery and murder is affirmed based on primary holding that defendant's claim under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. section 3162, is barred by the Act's waiver provision, and not subject to review for plain error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b). [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm by assoulineberlowe
Procedural History Based on the foregoing facts, Elias LLC filed suit against Shiji in August 2019. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Aviles-Colon, No. 05-1384, 05-2039, 05-2040 Conviction for conspiracy to distribute heroin, cocaine, and marijuana at three drug points in Puerto Rico in violation of 21 U.S.C. sections 841(a) and 846 and for possession of firearms, is affirmed for two appellants and vacated for the third appellant where: 1) with respect to the two appellants there is no reversible error; and 2) with respect to the third appellant, the government failed to disclose exculpatory… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
Denturist Association of Canada, 2014 FC 989, the Federal Court ruled that copyright does not subsist in the five-digit numerical codes and corresponding description of denturist services contained within the DAC Procedures Codes and DAC Fee Guides. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
’ (Patently-O) Recent USPTO roundtable – proposed BPAI Ex Parte Appeals Rules modifications (Daily Dose of IP) (Inventive Step) USPTO announces interim procedure for patentees to request patent term adjustment recalculation (Anticipate This!) [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Hardiman emphasized that the rule which passed the test had been enacted through the proper public notice and comment process which is required by Congress. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm by cdw
The appellate court reversed for noncompliance with the rule, ordering a new trial. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
The order comes just weeks after the appellate court granted the Obama administration's request to expedite the case.The government hopes to overturn U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
The Florida-based defendant was ordered to pay the defendant company $150,000 - the maximum that could be awarded as copyright infringement damages. [read post]