Search for: "In Re: Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to The Bar" Results 21 - 40 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The majority was led to that conclusion by two Supreme Court rulings based upon the “political process” rationale. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the following cases for the upcoming term. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am by Alex Phipps
The trial court denied this petition, relying on In re Borden, 216 N.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
  In denying Elrac's motion, Queens County Supreme Court Justice Devin P. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 It is a special personal and professional thrill to be in this landmark building on 44th Street and addressing the Bar of Elihu Root, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Jeh Johnson, and Mary Jo White. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 10:03 am by Francis Pileggi
Judge LeGrow wrote that in keeping with the high court’s ruling in a coverage action for an appraisal suit in In Re Solera Insur. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:26 am by Michael Thomas
 The application by Global was brought pursuant to Rule 165 of the Queen's Bench Rules of Court which the Court found was limited to allowing a party to amend its own pleadings, not the pleadings of another party. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Lightfoot, where the Supreme Court held that the 15th Amendment barred redrawing the Tuskegee, Alabama, electoral map in a manner that was not explicitly designed to exclude Black voters, but had the effect of doing so. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Jonathan Holbrook
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Supreme Court released on December 18, 2020. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
 Amendments to section 11 of the ACA – In order to ensure speedy appointment of arbitrators, section 11 may be amended to provide that the appointment of arbitrator(s) under the section shall only be done by arbitral institution(s) designated by the Supreme Court (in case of international commercial arbitrations) or the High Court (in case of all other arbitrations) for such purpose, without the Supreme… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 5:53 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
  Res Judicata is related to the public policy against “claim splitting” which may bar a subsequent claim “if a Plaintiff was able to present it, in its entirety, in the prior forum. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Despite the sturm und drang with which the defense bar greeted the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday in Williams v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Brownback, 22-912 Issue: Whether the Federal Tort Claims Act’s judgment bar, which this court has repeatedly said functions in much the same way as the common-law doctrine of res judicata, nevertheless operates to bar claims brought together in the same action. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
This Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision that disposed of two cases, Riley v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am by Walter Shaub
We know this absolute bar well, as one of us served as Director of the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
  Drawing on the 14th Amendment and other provisions, the Supreme Court has held that many of these rights cover all “persons” within the United States, regardless of citizenship or status. [read post]