Search for: "In Re: Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to The Bar"
Results 41 - 60
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
Admission of Documentary Evidence. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
California, and the Third Amendment’s rule against quartering troops in times of peace, which has never arisen in a Supreme Court case, although lower courts have suggested that it is “incorporated. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
Despite the earlier guilty plea and jail sentence, the DA has decided to press charges related to homicide. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
Justice Garson of the Supreme Court of British Columbia considered the admissibility of a court monitor’s report and the compellability of a monitor as an expert witness in Pine Valley Mining Corporation (Re), and cited Janis Sarra in "Rescue! [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:32 pm
To benefit from this lowered bar for admissibility, the State must show that the required procedures were followed. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
On a related note, in August of this year, the amendments to Pa.R.C.P. 4003.5(a)(4) became effective. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
On a related note, in August of this year, the amendments to Pa.R.C.P. 4003.5(a)(4) became effective. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Bamzai’s brief cites cases that predate the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) involving military commissions from the Civil War, the Spanish-American War, World War II (citing Ex parte Vallandingham, In re Vidal, and In re Yamashita respectively) and compares the CAAF to the National Labor Relations Board, over which the Supreme Court exerts no original review (for the latter analogy, he refers an argument made by Richard Fallon in his… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
” Similarly, subsection 111(2)(e) of the Ontario Labour Relations Act gives the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) the power to “accept such oral or written evidence as it in its discretion considers proper, whether admissible in a court of law or not”. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
If the Supreme Court were to credit that evidence, it could rule against Harvard without necessarily calling into question other aspects of its admissions policy. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” In 1972, the Supreme Court clarified in Gravel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Supreme Court, October 14, 2008 Moore v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
But since 1890, the majority explained, Mississippi voters had re-enacted the disenfranchisement provision twice – in 1950 and 1968 – and the challengers do not contend that the 1968 amendment was motivated by an intent to discriminate. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
The court It began by noting that the 6th Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled that those claims could go forward. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In In re Mance, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that flat fees are not earned upon receipt. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Court of Claim's ruling. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:49 am
R. 56(C), and asks the court to re-endorse the gate-keeping function of this rule. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Justice RaveendranSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Sanjeev Kumar Jain Vs. [read post]
