Search for: "In Re: Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to The Bar"
Results 81 - 100
of 244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
He might think that if he damages the prestige of the courts, he can defy the Supreme Court if it ultimately rules against the travel ban. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
In a previous posting by Darren Olivier here, the decision of the American Supreme Court in In re Tam, case 2014-1203 was discussed. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:05 pm
Amendments to section 11 of the ACA – In order to ensure speedy appointment of arbitrators, section 11 may be amended to provide that the appointment of arbitrator(s) under the section shall only be done by arbitral institution(s) designated by the Supreme Court (in case of international commercial arbitrations) or the High Court (in case of all other arbitrations) for such purpose, without the Supreme… [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports on last week’s Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of “the 1971 Supreme Court case Clay v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:32 pm
To benefit from this lowered bar for admissibility, the State must show that the required procedures were followed. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Moreover, subsection d is rationally related to that legitimate State interest. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Ruiz argued that the government’s positions that they should come in as statements against interest raised a problem under Bruton, a case in which the Supreme Court held that the admission of one party’s confession in a joint trial violated the other party’s right of cross-examination secured by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
Link to Court of Appeals Docket here ---> 01-15-00943-CV Background In their Second Amended Statement of Claim, the Parkers, pursuant to the rules of the Financial Industry National Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"),[1] initiated arbitration proceedings against IB. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm
Sharon Keller, the presiding judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, is his board chair and, frankly, the criminal defense bar probably doesn't trust her and further than they could pick her up and throw her. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
On the term’s final sitting day, the Supreme Court granted the government’s petition for certiorari in the travel-ban cases, and ordered re-argument in Sessions v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 3:38 am
It was 51 years ago today that the phrase “Miranda warning” was born, after the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark case about the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Part II will assess how the court marshals the Supreme Court’s precedents concerning reviewability of immigration decisions and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:08 pm
North Carolina Supreme Court cases. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
But at George Mason (now the Antonin Scalia Law School) the admissions advisor, Prof. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
In re Ferrer, Colorado Supreme Court, 2017 CO 14 (Feb. 27, 2017). [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court upheld it in Sale v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
(In Re Collado-Munoz, 21 I. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
“You’re basically saying we shouldn’t look at it,” he told Purcell. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm
Drawing on the 14th Amendment and other provisions, the Supreme Court has held that many of these rights cover all “persons” within the United States, regardless of citizenship or status. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
It found (contrary to the Supreme Court’s later ruling in Walker v. [read post]
