Search for: "In Re: Application of Chevron" Results 21 - 40 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Australian legislatures are not frequently having to re-draft legislation in response to court decisions which interpret administrative powers differently from the way they are understood by the executive (though there are some examples). [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:18 pm by Sean Wajert
E.g., In re Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 109 F.3d 1016, 1020 (5th Cir. 1997). [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
—but with a pathbreaking and formidable applications offering); Amazon (a pioneer and still-leading firm in both e-commerce and cloud services, as well as a revolutionary and expanding distribution model focused on quick delivery, among other efforts like space travel); Facebook (now Meta; a successful social-media platform expanding into virtual reality); and Google (now Alphabet; originator of the most successful internet search engine, also competing head-to-head with Apple and… [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by AALL Spectrum
They’re all using SALI as a legal-data standard. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:16 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  And while the Chevron deference doctrine should never apply in a manner to allow an agency to criminalize conduct, Chevron itself may perhaps meet its just end when the Supreme Court decides the following issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency, which concluded that the Clean Water Act’s application is restricted to “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency, which concluded that the Clean Water Act’s application is restricted to “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
But courts have also identified a need to protect states’ authority and interests by limiting removal to situations in which a federal defense is applicable, hence, an additional requirement for removal. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
One of the moves in the Brunstein-Goodson piece is downplaying economic and political significance as a factor for the MQD’s application. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
 . lose your ability to help to shape what comes next in the application of that rule. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:50 am by Dan Farber
If the Chevron decision remains in effect (iffy), this regulation would get some deference from courts. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
  On this issue the Court did not accord HHS Chevron deference,[6] because Congress had conferred no rulemaking power upon the Department. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:31 am by Kalvis Golde
Raimondo 22-451Issues: (1) Whether, under a proper application of Chevron v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:18 am by Gus Hurwitz
” This conclusion follows from a direct application of Chevron: courts are responsible for determining whether a statute is ambiguous; agencies are responsible for determining the (reasonable) meaning of a statute that is ambiguous. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
   This analysis also has implications for administrative law’s Chevron doctrine. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am by Bernard Bell
  See In Re Sponsorship Identification Requirements for Foreign Government-Provided Programming, Report and Order, FCC 21-42 (April 22, 2021)(adding subsection (j) to 47 C.F.R. [read post]