Search for: "In Re: Application of Chevron" Results 81 - 100 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 5:15 pm by Joel A. Webber
As Chief Justice Roberts put it in a case where he dissented from Chevron‘s application: “We do not leave it to the agency to decide when it is in charge. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm by Mike
Borja and Chevron argue that this evidence establishes the application is brought in bad faith, evidence of cooperation and the specter that evidence relevant and discoverable in one proceeding might be shared with an interested party in parallel or related proceedings does not constitute bad faith sufficient to deny anotherwise valid application under § 1782.Judge Breyer denied the motion to reconsider his denial of Mr. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:33 am by David G. Badertscher
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Chevron Is Granted Additional Subpoenas in Ecuador Litigation In re Application of Chevron Corp. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 SmithKline’s brief stressed that the uncritical application of Auer deference can empower agencies to circumvent the normal process for revising regulatory requirements and evade the limitations on Chevron deference imposed by Christensen and Mead. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The application of choice of law in this context is rather specific; the rules, however, apply to a great many types of international litigation. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:53 am by Ronald Mann
” The provision obviously covers those who sell cars and those who fix them, but its application to those who sell services is not nearly so clear. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:31 am by Kalvis Golde
Raimondo 22-451Issues: (1) Whether, under a proper application of Chevron v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
Supreme Court’s 1984 Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Adeline Rolnick
Supreme Court’s 1984 Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:30 am by Aaron Marr Page
Naranjo, 667 F.3d 232, 244 (2d Cir. 2012); see also In re Chevron Corp., 650 F.3d 276, 294 (3d Cir. 2011) (“Though it is obvious that the Ecuadorian judicial system is different from that in the United States, those differences provide no basis for disregarding or disparaging that system. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:17 pm by WIMS
If we're serious about reducing the deficit, this is an easy place to start. [read post]