Search for: "In Re: Application of Chevron" Results 141 - 160 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 11:19 am by Dan Kirkpatrick
Even if the 2017 rules are allowed to continue unchanged under a Democratic FCC, applicants could likely expect a tighter review of waivers of the top-four prohibition on television duopolies. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm by John Bellinger
   They argue that there is no split among the circuit courts on the issue of corporate liability (despite the Second Circuit’s decision in In re Arab Bank). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The court vacated the summary judgment on the takings claim, and remanded the case to the trial court for application of the Penn Central test. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:30 am by John K. Ross
Chevron deference does not apply because there is no ambiguity in the statute. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
Supreme Court should not overrule its Chevron rule in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming paper for the George Washington Law Review, Kristin E. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel The strange affair of Israel patent application nos. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
 “That consumers focus on transmission to the exclusion of add-on applications is hardly controversial. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:47 am by Gustavo Arballo
But Chevron is understood and operates quite differently from most of the other statutory interpretation rules. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
"Chevron," "Skidmore," and "Auer" are the names of the Supreme Court cases recognizing various formulations of administrative deference applicable in different situations.Anyway, what deference means as a practical matter is that these SG/FDA amicus briefs have independent significance. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:30 am by Anthony Colangelo
Whether the ATS’s jurisdictional character alters the application of the presumption against extraterritoriality; 2. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
One of the moves in the Brunstein-Goodson piece is downplaying economic and political significance as a factor for the MQD’s application. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm by Sandi Zellmer
” If not, it follows that the hovercraft ban is not a regulation applicable solely to public lands within the conservation unit and thus the ban would be allowed under Section 103(c). [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Balto determined that RIFO will likely be upheld, but overturning RIFO would “almost certainly be a reinterpretation of Chevron. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:52 pm by CSSFIRM.COM
Bard  officials even more suspect, the attorney for the Plaintiff added that in order to protect their supply of this plastic mesh material, (which is not produced for the purpose of and should not be used  in “medical applications involving permanent implantation in the human body or permanent contact with internal body fluids or tissues” ) the Bard officials warned each other in e-mails not to allow the Chevron Philips executives to learn they were using the… [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by James Kim
Justice Gorsuch, has described that method, articulated in the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:18 pm by Sean Wajert
E.g., In re Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 109 F.3d 1016, 1020 (5th Cir. 1997). [read post]