Search for: "In Re: Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 12:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its ruling on the issue of class certification in a case captioned In re: Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:44 am
In Re: Aqua Dots Products Liability Litig., No. 10-3847 (7th Cir. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
Ohio Aug. 12, 2011) (same); In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2009 WL 3398930 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
") In re Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation, No. 10-3847 (7th Cir. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
Judge Easterbrook, in his recent opinion in In re Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation, identifies one common theme: that Rule 23 means what it says: A district court is no more entitled to depart from Rule 23 than it would be to depart from one of the Supreme Court’s decisions after deeming the Court’s doctrine counterproductive. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:36 pm
Ill. 2010) (invoking lead defendant in products liability related multidistrict litigation). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
("No-injury" class actions are common in products liability.) [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
("No-injury" class actions are common in products liability.) [read post]
