Search for: "In Re: B of I Holding, Inc. Shareholder Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2024, 5:01 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court recently decided In re Match Group, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
Shareholder Litigation, C.A. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
The law is no different for shareholder derivative actions. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:24 am
Closing Thoughts I see two important takeaways from Galasso: First, Galasso demonstrates the unusual irony in the interplay between a shareholder’s right of inspection and litigation against the corporation or other shareholders. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:23 pm
First Interstate Bank, N.A., 511 U.S. 164 (1994), forecloses claims for deceptive conduct under 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. . . ., where Respondents engaged in transactions with a public corporation with no legitimiate business or economic purpose except to inflate artifically the public corporation's financial statements, but where Respondents themsleves made no public statements concerning these transactions.In the case below, In re Charter Communications,… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:16 pm
Intercargo Corp., 768 A.2d 492 (Del.Ch.2000); In re Lukens Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
The Delaware chancery court has decided two very important cases arising out of notorious cases of managerial malfeasance or neglect - In re Citigroup Inc Shareholder Derivative Litigation, decided February 24, and American International Group, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:34 pm
In Re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:17 am
Candlewood is the latest chapter in a ten-year, serial litigation between competing 50/50 shareholder factions of a company called ANO, Inc. whose primary asset is a 2/3 ownership interest in Candlewood Holdings, Inc. which, in turn, owns a 90% interest in a company that owns and operates a commercial property. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm
On November 25, 2014, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a decision in In Re Comverge, Inc. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
I. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
See In re Netsmart Techs., Inc. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
”[12] Shareholders bear the brunt of these abuses; “[i]nvestors always are the ultimate losers when extortionate ‘settlements’ are extracted from issuers. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am
Rather, the compelling justification concept articulated by Chancellor Allen in Blasius Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
In In Re Celera Corporation Shareholder Litigation, C.A., No. 6304-VCP (Del. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
Chandler III issued an important decision in a case of first impression in Delaware in the takeover battle between Airgas Inc. and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., on the issue of when the next annual Airgas shareholders meeting could be held. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Figure 1: B. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:06 pm
Solutions, 365 F.3d 353, 366 (5thCir. 2004); In re Omnicare, Inc. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
Shareholder Litigation (merger transaction involving consideration of 33% cash and 67% stock did not trigger Revlon) with In re Lukens Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
Having spent the better part of my career litigating disputes between minority and majority owners of closely-held businesses, I can comfortably say that all else equal, I would prefer to be a minority shareholder of a New York corporation than a minority member of a New York LLC. [read post]
