Search for: "In Re: Capital One Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 12:16 pm
’” Capital One Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litig. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 11:08 am
A new bill in Florida is working its way through the legislature which will require all registered sex offenders to provide all telephone numbers when they register. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
If you’re reading a blog post that is entirely devoted to cases on the Supreme Court’s docket that haven’t even been granted yet, chances are you’re a law nerd. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:24 am
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
AMG Capital Management, INC. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
Not only did the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) stay relevant as the technology it meant to regulate grew obsolete, but evolving views of the Act’s provisions regulating the use of an “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS) gave birth to a multi-billion dollar litigation windfall more than 20 years later. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
The case presents a question about litigants’ ability to challenge in district court Federal Communications Commission orders construing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, because of a provision known as the Hobbs Act – this one, not the one you’re thinking about. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
In response to a January Executive Order requiring the federal government to minimize the economic and regulatory burdens of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
This lawsuit is one of the several recent IPO-related securities lawsuits filed in state court pursuant to the concurrent jurisdiction provisions of Section 22 of the ’33 Act. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Cindy Cohn:Now, I tend to think of it as a legal perspective, because I'm a litigator--I think, what doctrines are getting in the way? [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm
This is not to say that a litigant can merely defeat a motion to compel by claiming he or she never saw the alert. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
See e.g., In re Anthem, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 pm
Previously, the Court ruled on March 10, that the 2007 Travel Management Plan issued by the Lewis and Clark National Forest in Montana violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Montana Wilderness Study Act (MWSA). [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and de-branding of… [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The nature of empirical claims, however, requires that consumers of this work bring a healthy dose of skepticism to any of these projects. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
(And while you’re at it, see if they know what the hell a “bolo” is.) [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm
In In re TIAA-CREF Ins. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
Plaintiff asserted claims under the Consumer Product Safety Act and state law. [read post]