Search for: "In Re: Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Barnhill, 212 A.3d 822 (2018). [2] See PWC 2021 Annual Corporate Directors Survey, The Director’s New Playbook: Taking on Change, at 6. [3] See In re Caremark Inc Derivative Litigation, 698 A.2d 959, 970 (Del. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
The defense has become particularly important in connection with the extensive litigation the FDIC is now pursuing against the former directors and officers of failed banks. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
The defense has become particularly important in connection with the extensive litigation the FDIC is now pursuing against the former directors and officers of failed banks. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:00 pm by Todd Penner
  Although, this seems good for shareholders the panel mentioned the strong Business Judgment Rule protection offered in this area, citing In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:30 pm by Gordon Smith
Chancellor Chandler entertained such a claim last year in In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:56 am by Christine Hurt
Delaware Derivative Suit:  In re The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. [read post]
Chancellor Chandler referred to the Chancery Court’s decision in In re Citigroup Shareholder Derivative Litigation in holding that “substantive second-guessing of the merits of a business decision… is precisely the kind of inquiry that the business judgment rule prohibits. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 6:32 pm by buslawblogger
Shareholder Derivative Litigation' on SSRN with the following abstract: This article uses recent events and litigation involving Citigroup to... [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
(Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Katrina Dewey, CEO & Publisher, Lawdragon, Inc.) [read post]