Search for: "In Re: Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 2:00 pm
Although, this seems good for shareholders the panel mentioned the strong Business Judgment Rule protection offered in this area, citing In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Ch. 2007) and In re Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
Chancellor Chandler referred to the Chancery Court’s decision in In re Citigroup Shareholder Derivative Litigation in holding that “substantive second-guessing of the merits of a business decision… is precisely the kind of inquiry that the business judgment rule prohibits. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:30 pm
Chancellor Chandler entertained such a claim last year in In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The defense has become particularly important in connection with the extensive litigation the FDIC is now pursuing against the former directors and officers of failed banks. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
In December 2008, after the Securities and Exchange Commission (”SEC”) concurred in the exclusion of shareholder proposals seeking greater disclosure of risks related to mortgage investments at Washington Mutual, a coalition of over 60 investors called on then President-Elect Obama to limit the ability of companies to exclude shareholder proposals related to corporate risk evaluation.[10] The corporate governance challenges for the companies being targeted by… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
See also In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
(Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Katrina Dewey, CEO & Publisher, Lawdragon, Inc.) [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:40 pm
Chancellor Chandler made a similar point in a recent opinion in In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:36 am
Ch. 1996) and In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Citigroup (08/16/10) (SDNY) (Hon. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
The February 2009 Delaware Court of Chancery decision in In Re Citigroup Inc. [read post]