Search for: "In Re: Estate of Miller (Complete Opinion)"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2011, 3:35 pm
In re Miller, --- B.R. ----, 2010 WL 5184798 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla.2010) Assume Husband "A" and "B" are both recent widowers. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:38 pm
The opinion notes that the project’s construction price increased to more than $500,000 by the time of completion. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:32 pm
The Committee For Re-evaluation of the T-Line Loop, et al v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
"I made the mistake of leaving my honest opinion online," Steadman told Florida Today of checking "negative" in the feedback section eBay asks all buyers to complete at the end of a transaction. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:03 am
Miller v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Some CEQA practitioners think the sheer volume of published CEQA opinions demonstrates the need for reform – res ipsa loquitur, so to speak. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:11 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
Miller v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm
(CEQA Guidelines, § 15124; In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1175.) [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
" According to Shamoun, settlement discussions had completely broken down. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
In December 2014, it notified LandWatch it had additional documents it would mail upon receiving $34.80 in costs, but LandWatch did not request these documents until March 2015, at which time District had to re-gather them, and they were produced in April 2015. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
(While the opinion notes the trial court rejected Respondents’ and Real Parties’ “various procedural defenses” – which were not specified in the opinion, but which in fact included statute of limitations, mootness, and res judicata/collateral estoppel – the Court of Appeal expressly declined to reach these issues, stating in a footnote: “We need not address the Ohlsons’ various procedural defenses because we… [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
In short, an EIR is either complete or it is not. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 11:29 am
The City therefore recirculated a completely re-vamped revised draft EIR (RDEIR) in the form of a “project EIR” which essentially “replaced” the prior program EIR. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:32 pm
KYEstates often dicusses asset protection developments, and we’re pleased to share a really fascinating Florida decision, Miller v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
Res. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
” The Third District’s decision, much like its other recent opinion in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
” (Quoting In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1161-1162.) [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
On November 7, 2016, the Third District Court of Appeal filed a published opinion mostly upholding the EIR for a 48.75-acre, 328-unit residential infill project (known as McKinley Village) against various CEQA challenges, and finding the Project to be consistent with the City of Sacramento’s general plan. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Opinion delivered: June 26, 2015. [read post]
