Search for: "In Re: Executive Office of the President, Petitioner"
Results 21 - 40
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2020, 9:13 am
In re Trump, 780 F. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
The president can remove a director only “for cause. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
In al-Nashiri I, the issue was whether the CMCR’s judges were “principal” Executive Branch officers for purposes of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, and could therefore only be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:14 am
Petitioner claimed that Respondent committed fraud when it submitted a Statement of Use that was sign by a person who falsely claimed to be president of the company, when she was not an officer at all, and who signed the statement based on use of the mark by a third party. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:17 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:41 am
Officers have been forced to unnecessarily re-adjudicate cases that previously would have been approved quickly and efficiently. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Because Trump is the petitioner, his lawyer will be first at the lectern. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
Circuit says that the SEC ALJs are employees for Appointments Clause purposes, whereas the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit says they’re “Officers. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
Circuit says that the SEC ALJs are employees for Appointments Clause purposes, whereas the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit says they’re “Officers. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
In fact, the Executive Office of Immigration Review, the Justice Department agency that manages immigration courts, allows closed removal hearings in only a handful of instances that don’t seem to apply to Obama’s aunt. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Louis Sands presided over the 2014 criminal trial of Peanut Corporation of American executives. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
And at some level it's why we're here. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:20 pm
Petitioner's effort to construct an immunity from suit for unofficial acts grounded purely in the identity of his office is unsupported by precedent. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
One dealt with L-1B specialized knowledge in general, and the other focused on the significant impact on “new office” situations. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
One dealt with L-1B specialized knowledge in general, and the other focused on the significant impact on “new office” situations. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:17 am
Thus, some of its judges could be appointed by Executive Branch officials other than the President (in Edmond, the Secretary of Transportation); while others could be serving military officers (who had already been nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate). [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
., Petitioners, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
Moreover, the testimony irrefutably establishes both presiding judges perceived the campaign as a threat to their personal security and as an attempt to intimidate and harass them into ruling as the petitioners wanted. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 7:10 pm
Terabytes of text have already been generated in the course of extolling or excoriating President Obama for his November 20 Executive Actions on Immigration. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Section 3 provides:“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Con-gress, or elector of President and Vice President, orhold any office, civil or military, under the UnitedStates, or under any State, who, having previouslytaken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officerof the United States, or as a member of any State leg-islature, or as an executive or judicial officer of anyState, to support the Constitution of the United… [read post]
