Search for: "In Re: G.L." Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 11:32 am
The principle difference between Abuse Prevention Orders (G.L. c. 209A) and Harassment Orders (G.L. c. 258E) concerns the class of people eligible for relief under each law. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The case addresses the application and interpretation of the property tax exemption applied to religious houses of worship in G.L. c. 59, §5, Clause Eleventh, and raises First Amendment freedom of religion issues and potentially sweeping consequences for churches and other faith-based organizations. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Yesterday afternoon, the Court issued a notice that the quorum of Justices that heard argument in the case did not reach a majority decision, and that the case will be re-argued before the Court as now composed.The composition of the Court has changed significantly since the April 5 argument. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:13 am
Hartford argued that the claim was barred under principles of res judicata, and that plaintiffs could not split their claims. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Yesterday afternoon, the Court issued a notice that the quorum of Justices that heard argument in the case did not reach a majority decision, and that the case will be re-argued before the Court as now composed.The composition of the Court has changed significantly since the April 5 argument. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:55 am by Daniel Cappetta
”’” The Court rejected the defendant’s position, which “would require the Commonwealth to re-arrest any individual who previously had been released on conditions after a dangerousness hearing in the District Court, or released under G.L. c.276, §58, should the Commonwealth seek a dangerousness hearing following an indictment and subsequent arraignment in the Superior Court. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 12:27 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Res judicata includes claim preclusion, which prohibits the same parties from re-litigating the same claim that was the subject of an earlier action between the parties, as well as issue preclusion, which prohibits the parties from re-litigating an issue that was already litigated in a prior action based on a different claim. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:51 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Massachusetts Appeals Court released an opinion, In re Evans’ Case, reversing the decisions of the Department of Industrial Accidents and the administrative judge denying a worker’s claim for partial incapacity benefits under G.L. c. 152 § 35. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:56 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Appeals Court of Massachusetts addressed the issue of partial incapacity benefits pursuant to G.L. c. 152 § 35 in a workers’ compensation claim, In re Barbosa’s Case, 10 N.E.3d 1144 (Mass. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:59 am by Daniel Cappetta
“In 2013, the defendant … was indicted on two counts alleging aggravated statutory rape pursuant to G.L. c.265, §23A. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:32 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Adopting the opinion of the impartial medical examiner, the administrative judge awarded medical benefits pursuant to G.L. c. 152 § 30 and total incapacity benefits under G.L. c. 152 § 34 to the employee through April 1, 2004. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 9:51 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
According to G.L. c. 152 section 25A(2)(b) and (c), the self-insurer secured a bond from XL Reinsurance, purchased reinsurance, and then denied a request for reimbursement by XL, according to the reinsurance agreement. [read post]