Search for: "In Re: Grand Jury Subpoenas"
Results 41 - 60
of 495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
GA Code § 15-12-101 Special purpose grand juries may compel evidence and subpoena witnesses. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:55 am
“The subpoenas as written would encompass millions of pages of documents, most of which would be of no use to the grand jury or to investigators,” Potter wrote. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In recent days, the grand jury has issued subpoenas to a handful of people who are connected to the inquiry. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:45 am
Stern, Email to Patrick Philbin, Mike Purpura, and Scott Gast “Need for Assistance re Presidential Records” (May 6, 2021) Acting Archivist of the United States Debra Steidel Wall, Letter to Trump counsel Evan Corcoran (May 10, 2022) Grand Jury subpoena (May 11, 2022) Trump counsel Evan Corcoran, Letter to Justice Department (May 25, 2022) Trump counsel Christina Bobb, Certification on Responsive Documents (June 3, 2022) Former President Trump, … [read post]
27 May 2023, 11:05 am
R. 201(b)(4) In theory, you’re supposed to attach important exhibits to any pleadings in an Illinois divorce. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
Pence Appears Before Jan. 6 Grand Jury in Trump Special Counsel Probe MSN – Jacqueline Alemany and Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 4/27/2023 Former Vice President Mike Pence testified before a grand jury that has been investigating the riot at the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2023, 3:17 am
With new subpoenas and grand jury testimony, the Justice Department is moving aggressively to determine whether Trump ordered boxes containing sensitive material moved out of a storage room as the government sought to recover them last year. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
In In re Grand Jury, an unnamed law firm challenged a grand jury subpoena for documents withheld under a claim of attorney-client privilege. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:07 am
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS At least two dozen Mar-a-Lago staff have been subpoenaed to testify to a federal grand jury investigating former President Trump’s handling of classified documents. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Group Seeks Disbarment of a Trump-Aligned Lawyer for a Key Jan. 6 Witness DNyuz – Charlie Savage (New York Times) | Published: 3/6/2023 In appearing before the January 6 committee last year, Cassidy Hutchinson, the former White House aide who recounted Donald Trump’s conduct in the lead-up to the attacks on the Capitol, shared how her original lawyer had tried to influence her testimony. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
First, the Clause, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, does not provide sufficient legal basis to resist wholesale a subpoena to testify before the grand jury in the January 6th investigation. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
They’re Trying to Topple Trump. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The subpoenas are linked to a long-held GOP claim that federal agencies “targeted” parents. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:18 am
Torf (In re Grand Jury Subpoena), 357 F.3d 900 (9th Cir. 2003); Visa U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
The Jaramillo court considered a case where the defendant “was a passenger in a truck that was stopped by police attempting to serve a grand jury subpoena. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:40 pm
In re Grand Jury arose from a grand jury subpoena to a law firm seeking communications related to tax advice given to a client. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
ShareAfter the oral argument in In re Grand Jury, the smart money would have predicted either that the court would affirm the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:20 pm
As recently reported by The Washington Post,[1] an extensive new grand jury subpoena has been served on a number of Trump's associates, seeking two dozen categories of information, some of which has not previously been requested. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court’s first oral argument of 2023 involved a grand jury subpoena to a law firm for records related to tax preparation and advice given to a client who wanted to expatriate and was therefore subject to an “exit tax” for departing citizens. [read post]