Search for: "In Re: Jane Doe 22-B vs"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
(20-22).Here is a direct quote, which I use both to avoid having to re-write, and to illustrate Victor's writing:This was new terrain for U.S. copyright law, which had never been applied to such “mechanical” reproductions before. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
May 22, 2009)(Brister) (criteria for mandamus relief, shareholder derivative suit, sufficiency of pre-suit demand letter, notice) IN RE HAROLD R. [read post]
