Search for: "In Re: Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Kalpakian 446 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1971) 14 In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig. 712 F. [read post]
‘Zapata’ Procedure In shareholder derivative litigation, the shareholder plaintiff makes the threshold directional decision whether to (i) make a demand on the board of directors asking it to pursue the alleged claim, or (ii) purport to initiate litigation on behalf of the corporation and allege that pre-suit demand is excused as futile. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In our view, this hesitation stems from then-Vice Chancellor Leo Strine’s notorious 2003 decision in In Re Oracle Corp. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
  Indeed, the $118 million settlement may be among the largest shareholders’ derivative settlements of any kind, exceeded or equaled only by a small handful of prior derivative settlements (including, in addition to the UHG settlement noted above, the $115 million AIG derivative settlement and the $122 million Oracle derivative lawsuit settlement). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
This entire line of caselaw might be described as Strine’s revenge: it’s a direction he recommended with In re Oracle Corp. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:50 am by Steve Bainbridge
Chevron Corp., SPX Corp., Superior Energy Services, Inc., Franklin Resources, Inc., Curtiss-Wright Corp., Danaher Corp., and Solutia Inc. [read post]