Search for: "In Re: Revisions of Portion of The Rules of The Court of Criminal Appeals" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Appeals Court Ruling Means Over 100 Jan. 6 Rioters May Be Resentenced MSN – Rachel Weiner and Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 3/1/2024 A federal appeals court overturned a sentencing enhancement used against January 6 defendants charged with felony obstruction, a decision that means that over 100 convicted rioters may have to be resentenced. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Appeals Court Upholds Broad Use of Obstruction Law That Prosecutors Have Deployed Against Trump Yahoo News – Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein (Politico) | Published: 10/20/2023 Federal prosecutors avoided an appeals court ruling that could have upended their criminal prosecution of Donald Trump, but the legal battle will continue over a federal obstruction statute that has become a cornerstone of cases stemming from the storming of… [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am by Allan Blutstein
Aug. 5, 2022) -- affirming district court’s decision that Exemption 4 protected portions of pharmaceutical company's successful application for accelerated approval of a drug. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
Mazars—the Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling on Congress’s ability to investigate the president. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Around 2010, Democrats were also considering revising filibuster rules, as the passage of large legislation, such as Obamacare, was barely accomplished on a party-line vote that circumvented the filibuster only because of technical loopholes such as tax-and-spend “reconciliation” exceptions.And just seven or so years prior to that, in the middle of 2003, a Republican Senate majority, fed up with the Democrats’ invocation of supermajoritarian cloture… [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Acting in a dispute over records related to President Trump’s Trump International Hotel, the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruled lawmakers can resort to the courts to enforce an obscure statute known as the seven-member rule. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on December 31, 2020. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Emmitt Sullivan began scrutinizing the Justice Department’s bid to dismiss the criminal case against Michael Flynn, the former Trump national security adviser who pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Appeals Court Greenlights Emoluments Suit against Trump Politico – Josh Gerstein | Published: 5/14/2020 A lawsuit accusing President Trump of violating the Constitution by accepting foreign government money through his Washington, D.C. hotel can proceed to fact-gathering about Trump’s profits, a federal appeals court ruled. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
" Perhaps the District Court in aPriori was right in issuing the injunction—but it did so without sufficient guidance from the Ninth Court, and Broquard likewise lacked a clear statement of the legal rule around which he could have structured his argument. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
A second case involved the administration’s appeal of a judge’s October ruling that grand jury information in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe should be provided to lawmakers. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Chris Collins pleaded guilty to insider trading charges, ending a congressional career that pushed the House to craft rules prohibiting members from serving on public company boards. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
In Kansas, mental illness that prevents a criminal defendant from knowing his/her actions were wrong is not a defense to criminal liability. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:32 am by Preston Lim
To receive maximum points in the economic benefits category, suppliers have to provide contractual guarantees that they will re-invest the “value of their proposed contract” in Canadian industry. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
It amended Family Court Act 812 to include it in the list of crimes that constitute a family offense and added it to Criminal Procedure Law 530. 11 The Civil Rights Law was amended to add new cause of action, in Civil Rights Law § 52–b titled Private right of action for unlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image. [read post]