Search for: "In Re: Revisions of Portion of The Rules of The Court of Criminal Appeals"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
" Perhaps the District Court in aPriori was right in issuing the injunction—but it did so without sufficient guidance from the Ninth Court, and Broquard likewise lacked a clear statement of the legal rule around which he could have structured his argument. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Spencer, No. 07-40593 "A decision amending a 1995 judgment sentencing defendant for carjacking, resulting in an increase to the amount of restitution owed, is affirmed where: 1) under a reasonable reading of the relevant rules and case law, the district court's amendment amounted to a clerical revision that did not substantively alter defendant's sentence; and 2) thus, the time limitation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 was… [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
As stated by the court, “Since Oakwood’s amended ordinance provided Plaintiffs the injunctive relief they sought; as a result, that portion of Plaintiffs’ claims is indeed moot. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
As stated by the court, “Since Oakwood’s amended ordinance provided Plaintiffs the injunctive relief they sought; as a result, that portion of Plaintiffs’ claims is indeed moot. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
Aalim appealed. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Circuit in In re Navy Chaplaincy, which invites the Supreme Court’s review. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
A Texas appeals court says that the court cannot reform a noncompete to eliminate the damages remedy otherwise available through arbitration: Gray Wireline Service, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm
” The Sixth Circuit (and several others) follow a “blanket rule” that such orders are always appealable. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
The trial court granted the motion, but the Court of Appeal vacated the trial court’s order. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: In Re Detention of West: The Court affirmed Mr. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:56 am
Hello, boys and girls and welcome to the October 2017 of the Reasonably Suspicious podcast covering Texas criminal justice politics and policy. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:34 am
In ruling on Gordon’s arguments, the Court of Appeals presumed that he was the person who participated in the Internet chat sessions. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 4:49 am
An appeals court has now overturned an earlier decision by New Zealand's High Court. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:59 am
Resolutions were formulated and voted on in relation to the portions of the Evidence Code assigned to each discussion group. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
Aug. 5, 2022) -- affirming district court’s decision that Exemption 4 protected portions of pharmaceutical company's successful application for accelerated approval of a drug. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am
Father appealed, but did not challenge the “without justifiable cause” portion of the court’s ruling. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Many nations claim jurisdiction over portions of the area, including the UK, France, New Zealand, Norway, Australia, Chile, and Argentina. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
http://j.st/pFi In re Attorney's Fees of BettencourtCourt: Hawaii Supreme Court Docket: SCAP-30616 October 19, 2011 Judge: McKenna Areas of Law: Criminal Law, Government & Administrative Law In the case underlying this appeal, the circuit court appointed Appellant David Bettencourt to represent a client in a criminal case. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Observes Equitable Estoppel Requires Close Scrutiny of Child.In re K.G., v. [read post]
