Search for: "In Re: Robert A. Liptak" Results 41 - 60 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am by Jim Sedor
The SEC alleged Robert Crowe, a lawyer hired as a fundraiser and lobbyist by State Street, also took part in the kickback scheme. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
The President re-nominated him in January 2013, and he was confirmed in May. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:27 am by Jeff Gamso
  That John Roberts, of course, does not sit on the US Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s argument in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:45 am
(The split was along party lines, with Kagan, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Breyer voting to stay, and Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Roberts, Thomas, and Alito in the majority.) [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, and Deanna Paul and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am by Ross Davies
., 2013 WL 4082893 (7th Cir. 2013) • Susan Illston, In re National Security Letter, 930 F.Supp.2d 1064 (N.D. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 8:50 pm
" --Eric Turkewitz at New York Personal Injury Law Blog, Jonathan Adler at Volokh, and Howard Erichson at Mass Tort Litigation Blog all comment on Adam Liptak's New York Times piece on American punitive damages as they're viewed in other countries. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the court will also “decide whether members of the Electoral College may cast their votes for presidential candidates other than the ones they had pledged to support. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that in a statement accompanying the order in the North Carolina voter ID case, “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
  Richard Re covered the oral argument in Williams for this blog, with other coverage from Tony Mauro for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required) and Danielle Blevins of Talk Media News; Nina Totenberg previewed the case for NPR. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 7:26 am by Joe May
Hickenlooper’s Re-Election Hopes” by Alan Greenblatt in Governing. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
United States, Adam Liptak, high court correspondent for The New York Times, wrote that justices “across the ideological spectrum appeared inclined to uphold a controversial part,” of the law, and Robert Barnes, of The Washington Post, said the Court “seemed receptive” to the state’s argument that its racial profiling law “was a valid exercise of its power to protect its borders. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:48 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion provides some language suggesting the high court was not radically re-reading precedent on the commerce clause. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
"Justices to Hear Major Challenge to Partisan Gerrymandering": Adam Liptak has this front page article in today's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the term will begin “with the focus not on the court’s docket but on the court itself and a future that will be defined by the presidential election. [read post]