Search for: "In Re: Robert Moore Petitioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
. and it’s quite clear that they’re not interpreting the law, they’re making the law. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:46 am
Moore v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Readers may recall that Moore presents the question whether Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution--which assigns to state legislatures the authority to determine the manner of elections for Congress--precludes state court judicial review under the state constitution of political gerrymandering.The petitioners are Republicans who object to the North Carolina Supreme Court's invalidation of the map drawn by the GOP-controlled legislature and its remand to the trial court to… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:29 am
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed, agreeing that the home was a “vessel” since it was “capable” of movement over water despite petitioner’s subjective intent to remain moored indefinitely. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly used Moore v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
We now affirm that decision for the following reasons. 07b0007p.06 2007/06/13 In re: Robert Fox v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
Roberts added that determining the role the citizen’s speech played in the arrest involves factual questions about subjective intent. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
” Brian Keith Moore v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
RANDY JOSEPH MOORE. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
 http://www.waynetompkins.us/legal/Filed_11-20-2008_Tomkins_Petition.pdfIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WAYNE TOMPKINS, Petitioner, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Moore, 2nd Dist. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
How can there be a “controversy,” one might wonder, if the parties are in alignment on the question they’re asking the Court to resolve? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
See In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Feb. 2, 2020) (Opinion by Justice Jane Nenninger Bland) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 18-0228 ══════════ ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER, LP AND TEXAS HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE LLC , PETITIONERS, v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Roberts was oddly muted on most issues. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
" How did the California court stray so far from the Fourth Amendment's moorings? [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
Charles Edward Moore, 2011 Cal. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
Moore’s Law may be on its death bed (if not already at an end), but it departs having made its mark over the last 30 years. [read post]
