Search for: "In Re: Rules Governing Admission to The Mississippi Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
It also prohibits states from maintaining regular armies and navies in time of peace, and absolutely bars them from “engag[ing] in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm by Josh Blackman
I like to think that the Court's procedure rules can be applied neutrally, but alas, no. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
But since 1890, the majority explained, Mississippi voters had re-enacted the disenfranchisement provision twice – in 1950 and 1968 – and the challengers do not contend that the 1968 amendment was motivated by an intent to discriminate. [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:54 pm by John Ross
Last year both the Michigan Supreme Court and the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that their states' constitutions provide implied causes of action against government officials who violate state constitutional rights. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Mississippi officials have asked the Court to decide whether all pre-viability abortion restrictions are unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court ruled poor people accused of serious crimes were entitled to lawyers paid for by the government. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by Colby Pastre
Like the federal government, states play a critical role in responding to the novel coronavirus outbreak. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:47 am by Paul Caron
Petition to Amend the Rules Governing Admission to the Mississippi Bar: [T]he Board believes limiting the number of times applicants can retake the exam is appropriate and will better equip those repeatedly failing the test to pass it in the future and will eliminate a revolving door of re-takers that... [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
The Phillips Court observed that a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling government interest even if it has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States about what the governing rule is in cases involving plurality decisions. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Mississippi, 14-10486, and Williams v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:56 am by Jim Sedor
The attendees are not charged admission or a per-plate fee. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, 13-1496. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Petitioners ask whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
University of Texas at Austin 14-981 Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit’s re-endorsement of the University of Texas at Austin’s use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions decisions can be sustained under this Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Fisher v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Michael Markarian
Horse Slaughter: For fiscal years 2014 and 2015, Congress reinstated a vital “defund” provision that had been in place from 2007 to 2011 barring the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:34 pm by Michael Markarian
It makes no sense for the federal government to spend millions of taxpayer dollars to oversee new horse slaughter plants at a time when Congress is so focused on fiscal responsibility. [read post]