Search for: "In Re: S.O." Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2021, 12:21 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In this EQE appeal against a decision awarding 41 marks for paper B 2019, "requests were made to revoke the decision and to have to quantify the extent to which the advantage of the participants in the "pilot project" of the EQE 2019 was reflected in a better result, and based on this knowledge, in particular to reevaluate task B of the complainant, so that the complainant's entire 2019 EQE is deemed to have been passed". [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 10:50 pm by Frank Marciano
K.O. also had a daughter, S.O., from a different relationship. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sch. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:00 pm
Justice Penny did not follow the Application Judge’s decision in Re Milne Estate. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
The respondents successfully moved for summary judgment of the appellants’ action against them on the basis that the applicable two-year limitation period under s. 4 of the Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sched. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:43 am by Camille Milner
’” If you communicate your wishes in an open and honest way and your S.O. respects that, you’re very likely on the road to a solid relationship, Kessler added. 3. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm by Nico Cordes
Mai 2012, sich zum Einspruch der "BYK" zu äußern, rechtsverbindlich signalisiert, dass die Einsprechende damit eindeutig bezeichnet wäre. [read post]