Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Civil Cases (No.06-01)"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
If I did more civil work and had more time, I’d spend some of it discussing the case in more detail. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Frias, No. 06-5381 Conviction and sentence to life of imprisonment for conspiracy to commit murder in connection with a narcotics offense is affirmed over claims regarding: 1) insufficiency of the indictment; 2) erroneous jury instructions; and 3) various sentencing errors. . [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 28, 2008 US v. $92,300 in US Currency, No. 06-51033 Summary judgment ordering the forfeiture of currency allegedly found on claimant and in his vehicle is reversed where: 1) the government's evidence supporting its motion consisted of an affidavit containing hearsay evidence; and 2) legislative changes increasing the government's burden in civil forfeiture cases to a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard also… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Quarterman, No. 03-20401 "Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital murder case is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) trial counsel provided ineffective representation; and 2) jury instructions given at the sentencing phase of his trial violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Penry v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
Indeed, the Texas law at issue in this case provides greater protection for the patients and their families against loss of the constitutional right to trial by jury than federal law. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Washington standard was unreasonable. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
One count of the conviction is reversed where an error in jury instructions concerning possession of a firearm in furtheranc [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
The Texas highest court for civil cases is being urged to bless such claims under a revamped common-law theory known as quantum meruit (literally meaning “as much as is deserved”). [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
In this case, [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
In this case, [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
In our recent case of Edward Charles Washington and Travis Parker versus Aetna Life Insurance d/b/a One Canal Place, Schindler Elevator Corporation, Corporate Realty Advisors, and Zurich Insurance Company, Docket Number 01-9541-C of the Civil District Court of the City of New Orleans, all of the issues with respect to the potential modification of the video tape surveillance evidence was presented to us for defending. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
You know, with products liability, it’s pretty simple in regards to the fact that it has to be reasonable use, and you have to follow instructions. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
{At the hearing, the court further pressed the State's counsel on what kinds of proof would be necessary to prove a criminal defamation case before a judge (since individuals prosecuted for criminal defamation have no right to a jury). [read post]
