Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases (2006-3)"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 1:24 am
The Florida Supreme Court released the following court rule opinions:Opinions Released Mar. 19, 2009SC08_1612 - In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile ProcedureSC08_2176 - In re: Approval of Application for Determination of Indigent Status Form For Use By Clerks and Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.984Opinions Released Mar. 5, 2009OP_SC08_1488 - In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal… [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:03 pm
If we hold, as the court apparently does, that one implication of the existence of such precise, independent standards is that juries must be instructed to find facts according to those standards, we raise the spectre of requiring trial judges in defamation cases to instruct juries as to four separate and distinct burdens of proof, falling variously on the plaintiff and defendant. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:31 pm
If we hold, as the court apparently does, that one implication of the existence of such precise, independent standards is that juries must be instructed to find facts according to those standards, we raise the spectre of requiring trial judges in defamation cases to instruct juries as to four separate and distinct burdens of proof, falling variously on the plaintiff and defendant. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
Georgia Criminal Law News December 2017 PRE &POST CONVICTION LAW PUBLICATION JURY NOTE
Dowda v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Ct. 2020 (2008), affects the forfeiture determination in this case; and 3) the case is remanded for lower court to consider whether the imposition of the forfeiture violated the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment in light of recent pertinent case law. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
A-0603-06T1 (September 3, 2009) - Case remanded for evidentiary hearing. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:12 am
This summary will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am
Craig, 2006-Ohio-4571 (2006) (Allowing evidence of prior bad acts that had been previously rejected by a grand jury to be admitted in a subsequent criminal prosecution.) [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Lopez-Medina, 461 F.3d 724 (6th Cir. 2006). [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Wilson, No. 07-2162 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a first degree murder case is reversed where the use of a non-testifying co-defendant's statement at trial, even as redacted and subject to an instruction that the jury should not use it against defendant, was an unreasonable application of Bruton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
’” Slip op. at 3. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Harvey, No. 07-4310, 07-4311 Convictions and sentences for honest services wire fraud and bribery are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the sufficiency of the evidence; 2) whether the district court made several antagonistic comments in the presence of the jury that prejudiced them and the outcome of their cases; and 3) whether the district court incorrectly applied the Sentencing Guidelines to their cases. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
See Sixth Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions 1.03(5). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Ct. 625 (2006), by enhancing defendant's sentence for having previously been removed subsequent to an "aggravated felony" conviction. . [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:45 pm
According to the court, the trial judge’s jury instructions effectively gave the jury the correct legal issue: The jury was instructed that it could only award liability if the purpose of the police conduct was criminal-enforcement rather than medical. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bagley, No. 06-3471 In a criminal case, collateral estoppel may only be invoked by the accused. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Paradis further noted that in Lijeberg the Supreme Court even vacated the findings of a jury after a significant criminal trial already occurred. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
The dismissal of this First Degree Murder case are a sign that common sense does still exist in Maricopa Law and is the culmination of over 3 years of heartache for Lisa and her family. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
McCann, No. 06-3257 Denial of a habeas corpus petition from a sentence to life imprisonment for murder is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) Apprendi principles were violated because there was no jury determination establishing the facts necessary to impose an enhanced sentence; 2) defendant never waived his right to a jury trial as to his sentence; 3) double jeopardy barred another sentencing trial so he should be re-sentenced to the maximum term… [read post]
