Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases (No. 2005-3)" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am by Marcia Shein
Georgia Criminal Law News December 2017 PRE &POST CONVICTION LAW PUBLICATION JURY NOTE
 Dowda v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Ct. 2020 (2008), affects the forfeiture determination in this case; and 3) the case is remanded for lower court to consider whether the imposition of the forfeiture violated the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment in light of recent pertinent case law. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Juvenile’s confession was voluntary, but trial court reversibly erred in failing to consider the juvenile’s age when determining custody status for purposes of Miranda and G.S. 7B-2101 In re: J.D.F., ___ N.C. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Wilson, No. 07-2162 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a first degree murder case is reversed where the use of a non-testifying co-defendant's statement at trial, even as redacted and subject to an instruction that the jury should not use it against defendant, was an unreasonable application of Bruton v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Harvey, No. 07-4310, 07-4311 Convictions and sentences for honest services wire fraud and bribery are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the sufficiency of the evidence; 2) whether the district court made several antagonistic comments in the presence of the jury that prejudiced them and the outcome of their cases; and 3) whether the district court incorrectly applied the Sentencing Guidelines to their cases. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Ramos-Cardenas, No. 06-51383 Defendants' convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the sufficiency of the evidence; 2) whether some defendants' Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights were violated by admission of the post-arrest statements given by two codefendants, even though a limiting instruction was given to the jury; and… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Kentucky in concluding that petitioner had not presented a prima facie case of race discrimination with respect to jury selection at her criminal trial in state court. . [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
McCann, No. 06-3257 Denial of a habeas corpus petition from a sentence to life imprisonment for murder is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) Apprendi principles were violated because there was no jury determination establishing the facts necessary to impose an enhanced sentence; 2) defendant never waived his right to a jury trial as to his sentence; 3) double jeopardy barred another sentencing trial so he should be re-sentenced to the maximum term… [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm by David
The dismissal of this First Degree Murder case are a sign that common sense does still exist in Maricopa Law and is the culmination of over 3 years of heartache for Lisa and her family. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Quarterman, No. 03-20401 "Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital murder case is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) trial counsel provided ineffective representation; and 2) jury instructions given at the sentencing phase of his trial violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Penry v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 am by Susan Brenner
The first case was filed by Clemens on May 3, 2007 and was dismissed at the summary judgment stage by an order and memorandum dated May 22, 2009. . . . [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
March 3, 2008 - March 7, 2008 To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Each written credit service agreement contained a provision entitled "Waiver of Jury Trial and Arbitration Provision" (hereinafter referred to as "arbitration provision"). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
The trial court then brought the jury back into the courtroom, instructed the jurors not to consider Defendant’s absence in weighing the evidence or determining guilt, and allowed the State to continue to present its case. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia:  Destefano v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am by Andrew Delaney
 Numero uno es a criminal case where defendant appeals convictions for unlawful restraint, unlawful trespass, and obstruction of justice. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
Each case is different and there is no magic here. [read post]