Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases (No. 2005-4)"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
Georgia Criminal Law News December 2017 PRE &POST CONVICTION LAW PUBLICATION JURY NOTE
Dowda v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) allegedly improper venue; 2) the definition of "use" under 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) jury instruction regarding proof necessary for conviction under section 924(c); 4) constructive amendment or variance of the indictment; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; 6) a motion for acquittal; 7) alleged inaccuracies in the transcript of proceedings; 8)… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Fagans, 406 F.3d 138 (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Wilson, No. 07-2162 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a first degree murder case is reversed where the use of a non-testifying co-defendant's statement at trial, even as redacted and subject to an instruction that the jury should not use it against defendant, was an unreasonable application of Bruton v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
She is a grandmother to 4 children. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
McCann, No. 06-3257 Denial of a habeas corpus petition from a sentence to life imprisonment for murder is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) Apprendi principles were violated because there was no jury determination establishing the facts necessary to impose an enhanced sentence; 2) defendant never waived his right to a jury trial as to his sentence; 3) double jeopardy barred another sentencing trial so he should be re-sentenced to the maximum term of up to… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Quarterman, No. 03-20401 "Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital murder case is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) trial counsel provided ineffective representation; and 2) jury instructions given at the sentencing phase of his trial violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Penry v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Kentucky in concluding that petitioner had not presented a prima facie case of race discrimination with respect to jury selection at her criminal trial in state court. . [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
March 3, 2008 - March 7, 2008 To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
The trial court then brought the jury back into the courtroom, instructed the jurors not to consider Defendant’s absence in weighing the evidence or determining guilt, and allowed the State to continue to present its case. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Each written credit service agreement contained a provision entitled "Waiver of Jury Trial and Arbitration Provision" (hereinafter referred to as "arbitration provision"). [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
Numero uno es a criminal case where defendant appeals convictions for unlawful restraint, unlawful trespass, and obstruction of justice. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia: Destefano v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
Each case is different and there is no magic here. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Each of the loan contracts contains an identical Waiver of Jury Trial and Arbitration Provision. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
AS APPLIED TO THE DEFENDANTS IN THESE CASES, SALT LAKE CITY’S ORDINANCES RE PARK CURFEW AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT VIOLATE THEIR FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS AS PROTECTED BY THE UTAH CONSTITUTION. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. ____ (2008) (slip opinion, formatted below from .pdf to .doc format by LawPundit), which, although it is a special case of maritime law, definitely sets the logical/legal standards for treatment of punitive damages in other cases in the future.In the Exxon Valdez case, the jury had initially awarded $5 billion in punitive damages, which the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had reduced to $2.5 billion based upon due process considerations. [read post]
