Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases (No. 2005-7)" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) allegedly improper venue; 2) the definition of "use" under 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) jury instruction regarding proof necessary for conviction under section 924(c); 4) constructive amendment or variance of the indictment; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; 6) a motion for acquittal; 7) alleged inaccuracies in the transcript of proceedings; 8)… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Juvenile’s confession was voluntary, but trial court reversibly erred in failing to consider the juvenile’s age when determining custody status for purposes of Miranda and G.S. 7B-2101 In re: J.D.F., ___ N.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
The procedures for review of the detainees' status provided by the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 are not an adequate and effective substitute for habeas corpus, and consequently, section 7 of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA), operates as an unconstitutional suspension of the writ. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
March 3, 2008 - March 7, 2008 To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Background On 7 July 2015, Defendant was indicted by a Cabarrus County Grand Jury on four counts of felony embezzlement. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia:  Destefano v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
Each case is different and there is no magic here. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney
AS APPLIED TO THE DEFENDANTS IN THESE CASES, SALT LAKE CITY’S ORDINANCES RE PARK CURFEW AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT VIOLATE THEIR FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS AS PROTECTED BY THE UTAH CONSTITUTION. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
It is the court's province to determine what law is applicable and to so instruct the jury. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
In re: Jeffrey Beard, et.al. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
In both negligence and strict liability, a successful cause of action requires either breach of duty (negligence) or product defect (strict liability) before the case can get to the jury. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:15 pm
Crawford activated his overhead lights and instructed defendant to pull over to [**4] the right-hand side. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Judge Davidson conducted an arbitration trial on May 7 and June 5, 2014. [read post]