Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases"
Results 101 - 120
of 399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 11:30 am
This lead to a re-opening of the investigation. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
” Finding no case precedent addressing the appropriate standard of review for the hybrid procedures used at trial, the appellate court held that it would “review the trial court’s order based upon the standards of review as set forth for findings of fact in criminal cases regarding motions to suppress and motions for a new trial. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:30 am
In a patent and trademark infringement case, the court ordered an adverse inference jury instruction and monetary sanctions against the defendants for the spoliation of evidence. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
But the trial court's state-law jury instructions imposed a higher burden of proof for Zarda than federal law requires. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
By calling the evolution of the CMA's take on the console market theory of harm (which was a rational decision in recognition of hard facts) "irrational", Sony invokes the standard for appellate review (by the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:53 pm
So you're sitting in prison. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:15 am
When one thinks of beyond a reasonable doubt in the inverse it is a little easier to see just how difficult the standard is to meet assuming the jury holds strongly to the jury instruction’s dictate. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:15 am
When one thinks of beyond a reasonable doubt in the inverse it is a little easier to see just how difficult the standard is to meet assuming the jury holds strongly to the jury instruction’s dictate. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:15 am
When one thinks of beyond a reasonable doubt in the inverse it is a little easier to see just how difficult the standard is to meet assuming the jury holds strongly to the jury instruction’s dictate. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
"Because there is a reasonable probability that this erroneous instruction affected the jury’s verdict, we remand for a new trial. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 28, 2008 US v. $92,300 in US Currency, No. 06-51033 Summary judgment ordering the forfeiture of currency allegedly found on claimant and in his vehicle is reversed where: 1) the government's evidence supporting its motion consisted of an affidavit containing hearsay evidence; and 2) legislative changes increasing the government's burden in civil forfeiture cases to a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard also required that… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:25 am
Finally, several unemployment compensation cases provide career guidance: don’t yell at your boss, if you’re just surfing the web you may be okay, but not if you’re surfing for porn. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:29 pm
Some argue that the standard jury instructions are simply wrong. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
See In re D. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
Although the circuit court found his arguments on appeal without merit, they act nostra sponte to hold that it was an error not to apply the civil forfeiture standards established by the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
In the Courts (3 cases) NEW JERSEY MATTRESS COMPANY SETTLES IC MISCLASSIFICATION CASE WITH DRIVERS FOR $4.5 MILLION. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
SOURCE: Lawsuits.comA.A.R.P.: American Association of Retired Persons Abandon: To knowingly give up without intent to return or re-claim. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Brandao, No. 07-1215 Conviction and sentence for counts under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute (RICO) and Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering statute (VICAR) is affirmed over defendant's challenges regarding: 1) sufficiency of evidence that the government presented at trial on each of the elements of RICO and VICAR; and 2) a constructive amendment of the indictment via the jury instructions and the standard of prejudice that will be applied to… [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
That holding alone will likely invalidate dozens of state statutes and standard jury instructions. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Wilson, No. 07-2162 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a first degree murder case is reversed where the use of a non-testifying co-defendant's statement at trial, even as redacted and subject to an instruction that the jury should not use it against defendant, was an unreasonable application of Bruton v. [read post]
