Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases" Results 1 - 20 of 543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is the burden and standard of proof that the prosecution must meet in a criminal case in order to convict a defendant of a crime. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
”  After all, the Department of Justice and the grand jury have charged hundreds of individuals in connection with the January 6 attack on the Capitol—some even with “seditious conspiracy” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Consider also jury instructions: how do we talk to juries about this? [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am by Ashley Morgan
" [11] Even in the case of heart disease, mixed results have been found in studies conducted over the last 20 years. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:20 am by Broden & Mickelsen, LLP
The Judge Gave Improper Jury Instructions Judges provide guidelines to the jury on how to interpret laws and apply them to the case. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:20 am by Broden & Mickelsen, LLP
The Judge Gave Improper Jury Instructions Judges provide guidelines to the jury on how to interpret laws and apply them to the case. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am by Jacob Fishman
We discuss two debates arising from Rule 801(d)(2): first, whether an expert’s statements are attributable to the party that retained the expert, and second, whether statements by government officials are statements by a government party, particularly in criminal cases. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
Rodriguez, 2023 VT 59.On December 1, SCOV issued three criminal-law opinions. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:33 pm by crimdefense@hotmail.com
Individuals charged with OWI can challenge the accuracy of the sobriety tests results in court by providing evidence that they were not administered in a standardized way or that environmental conditions prevented them from completing them as instructed. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 11:45 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Defendants are allowed to request the court issue a limiting instruction to protect against jury misuse of that evidence. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
The first is whether the trial judge erred in his instructions to the jury regarding the use of evidence as to the accused’s mental health and the requisite intent for first degree murder. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump’s Classified Documents Case Schedule May Be Delayed, Judge Cannon Says MSN – Perry Stein and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 11/1/2023 The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s indictment for allegedly mishandling national security secrets suggested she might push back the planned trial timeline, as courts wrestle with the growing complexity of juggling four separate criminal cases and an ongoing civil trial against the former… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump’s defense can ask an appellate court to weigh in, but the standard for a federal appeals court or the U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:33 pm by crimdefense@hotmail.com
Individuals charged with OWI can challenge the accuracy of the sobriety tests results in court by providing evidence that they were not administered in a standardized way or that environmental conditions prevented them from completing them as instructed. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judge Says Peter Navarro Can’t Use Privilege as Defense in Contempt Case MSN – Paul Duggan (Washington Post) | Published: 8/30/2023 A judge ruled Peter Navarro, a Trump White House adviser charged with criminal contempt of Congress, cannot argue to a jury that he was barred by executive privilege from providing testimony and documents to the House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. [read post]