Search for: "In Re: The Matter Of The Grand v." Results 1 - 20 of 961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2008, 3:15 am
Here is an excerpt of the article:The Hickman v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit:  In re Grand Jury Matter #3, 2017 WL 383361 (2017) (per curiam). [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:21 am by Jacob Wirz
In In re Grand Jury, an unnamed law firm challenged a grand jury subpoena for documents withheld under a claim of attorney-client privilege. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The government's need for the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings is protected by temporarily restraining Twitter from divulging any information about the underlying grand jury subpoena until after this Court issues a final ruling in this matter. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm by Brian Shiffrin
We therefore reverse the judgment of conviction, grant the motion, and dismiss the indictment without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges under counts two through five of the indictment to another grand jury (see generally People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:26 pm
  But it was an honest mistake, and one that I'm not certain really mattered at all. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:08 am by INFORRM
  This application was referred to the Grand Chamber and was heard on 13 October 2010 along with Von Hannover v Germany (No.2). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:26 am by Ingrid Wuerth
In the in re Grand Jury Subpoena case itself, the commercial activity exception might apply whether under federal common law or the FSIA, so the distinction may not matter. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:58 am by Daniel Schwartz
The post You’re a Grand Old Flag – A (Very) Brief History in Employment Law appeared first on Connecticut Employment Law Blog. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:36 pm
Twenty five years ago, five attorneys were subpoenaed in the litigation referred to in In re Grand Jury Matters, 593 F. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Margaret Taylor
Under section 6(e) of the FRCP, certain people involved in a grand jury proceeding “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury,” including the grand jurors themselves, the government attorney presenting the case to the grand jury, the court reporter and other technical people involved in the proceeding itself. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
P. 6(e)(3)(E)(ii), discovery of grand jury proceedings may be granted where "a ground may exist to dismiss the indictment because of a matter that occurred before the grand jury. [read post]