Search for: "In Re: United States of America, Petitioner" Results 141 - 160 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-602, was not so lucky. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
We’re well into June now, and the court enters the morning with 27 outstanding merits cases. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am by John Elwood
” And with that, we’re done! [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
We note that the petitioner judges have stipulated to drop OCA as a party and to continue the lawsuit solely against the officials of the legislative and executive branches. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 1:28 pm by Dennis Crouch
Petitioner’s response here was that Congress wanted to keep the term “on sale” to retain much the underlying jurisprudence around it (such as the “ready for patenting” test) while abrogating certain outlier Federal Circuit cases like In re Caveney and Special Devices, which deemed secret sales to be patent-barring. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
STEPHANIE KAY LANNINGon writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit[June 7, 2010] Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
The returning cases include, a bit surprisingly, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:59 am by Orin Kerr
McCarthy is right that the United States was not formally at war with Britain at that time. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by John Elwood
United States and Yates v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
Petitioner's reply Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:10 am by Gregory Forman
 Since her election in 1994, Petitioner has been re-elected for successive six-year terms in 1998 and 2004. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 12 conference)   United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 11:43 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) of USCIS has no place in an agency charged with conferring immigration benefits on deserving petitioners and applicants. [read post]