Search for: "In Re: Vioxx Product"
Results 1 - 20
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2006, 11:43 am
Information regarding scheduled product liability trials in 2006 can be found at www.merck.com.As previously disclosed, individual and putative class actions have been filed against the Company in state and federal courts alleging personal injury and/or economic loss with respect to the purchase or use of VIOXX. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm
In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, No. 05-3700, slip op. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:29 am
Anyway, we're not surprised by the Vioxx settlement. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:43 am
In re Vioxx Class Cases, 2009 WL 4806197, Slip op. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 8:30 am
See In re Vioxx Prods. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
See Settlement Agreement, In re Vioxx Prods. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:42 am
In December, I promised more detailed comments about In re Vioxx Class Cases (December 15, 2009), decided by the Second Appellate District, Division Three. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 6:59 pm
For more information on this Vioxx ruling read this article.... [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:51 am
Yesterday I reported on the Second District’s Decision in In Re Vioxx Class Cases, __ Cal. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:51 am
In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 2153960 (E.D. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:51 pm
By Larry Wescott In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2007 U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 3:40 pm
We're once again not able to upload the decision from where we're blogging this weekend, but, on Monday morning, click here for a link to the decision.Cona and McDarby tried their "Vioxx caused our heart attacks" product liability cases. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2010 WL 2802352 (5th Cir. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:13 am
See In re: Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, No. 12-30560 (5th Cir. 2012). [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 12:57 am
To take advantage of this exception, the Vioxx plaintiffs pled (and every plaintiff in every Texas pharmaceutical product liability case will inevitably plead) that the defendant misled the FDA. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:52 am
See In re Vioxx Class Cases, No. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 10:14 am
I have to say that the article's title (Plaintiffs find Payday Elusive in Vioxx Cases) makes me cringe--these people aren't looking for "payday", they're looking for retribution and for a chance to hold pharma company Merck accountable for knowingly concealing evidence that Vioxx causes heart attacks. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 10:14 am
I have to say that the article's title (Plaintiffs find Payday Elusive in Vioxx Cases) makes me cringe--these people aren't looking for "payday", they're looking for retribution and for a chance to hold pharma company Merck accountable for knowingly concealing evidence that Vioxx causes heart attacks. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 5:38 am
The first product liability class action against Merck concerning Vioxx was filed on May 29, 2001; dozens of additional class action and individual complaints were filed after the FDA issued its Warning Letter in September 2001. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Id. at 6-8.The trial court certified as common issues the questions of general medical causation, Merck's knowledge, product defect, failure to warn, misrepresentation, and punitive damages. [read post]
