Search for: "In Re: v. Kater"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
He says that means that you're "gambling" under Washington law because the chips are "things of value" -- i.e., have value because they let you keep playing the game.Importantly, the panel holds that this is gambling not because some people sell these chips on a secondary market (e.g., the chips have "actual" cash value). [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 8:33 am
Case citation: Wilson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Vinson, by Tanya Katerí Hernández Of Glass Ceilings, Sex Stereotypes, and Mixed Motives: The Story of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 10:10 am
Nachdem Hegemann in den letzten Wochen shooting-star der Kritiker war, jetzt also der Kater nach der Party. [read post]