Search for: "In Re A.H"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The court threw out a lot of claims but not all of them.We're going to go through Guinan I first, but quickly (yeah, right, we know you guys), because it's necessary to understand Guinan II - the one we're most interested in.The remaining claims in Guinan I were malpractice (medical negligence), informed consent, fraud/misrepresentation, and medical monitoring.The first question was choice of law. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Bullock, 870 S.W.3d 2, 3 (Tex. 1994); In re E.A.G. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
A decision earlier this month by an upstate appellate court in a corporate dissolution proceeding called Matter of Stevens (Allied Builders, Inc.), 2010 NY Slip Op 05066 (4th Dept June 11, 2010), adds uncertainty to the already fuzzy array of precedents surrounding the question whether the filing of a dissolution petition triggers a mandatory buyback of the petitioner's shares under the provisions of a right of first refusal… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
A.H. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:19 pm
(Pix Credit: The era of the robot judge: are we prepared for a machine to pass sentence?) [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Rev. 185-211 (2010).Smithwick, Erica A.H. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
A lot of what follows is taken in more or less edited form from the amicus brief that Bexis filed with the California Supreme Court in Conte - a copy of which we're making available, here.One major problem with Conte is that the court placed form over substance. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:16 am
§§ 779.23, 779.303-.305; A.H. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
One of the ways we feed this blog is doing what comes naturally to us lawyers - reading recent cases - and hoping that something inspires us. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
[Professors Miller and Tucker miss the mark, while Saul Cornell disdains accuracy] An article by Duke law professor Darrell A.H. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
