Search for: "In Re AJA"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2021, 2:33 pm
We’re so grateful to the AJA Foundation for their partnership over the years and the hundreds of donors who took advantage of this matching gift opportunity to double their impact for justice. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:17 pm
Access details on the AJA from the White House (click here). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm
We're dramatically overregulating every aspect of the private sector in our country and now we're threatening to raise taxes on top of it. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 1:38 pm
Access the White House website on the AJA for complete details of the bill (click here). [read post]
26 May 2022, 9:15 am
We’re expected to speak his lingua franca of bad jokes and meet him halfway by agreeing that 'identity politics' should be just as susceptible to mockery as everything else.... [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 1:23 pm
They're actually trying to get something done. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:06 am
On re-listen, you see the first hints of what is to come. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:35 pm
Aja Goare of MTN News reports that the state is ready to consider a bill to allow use of the firing squad despite the failure to pass a similar bill earlier this year. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:46 am
At the same time the traditions of secrecy has also become an important part of the cultures of religious practice practice that are only recently being re-considered. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
“We’re thrilled to have their energy, wit, talents and passion in our hub. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:19 am
The judge began by making clear that although the AJA restricts discussion of the facts and evidence relating to the proceedings, it does not prevent publication of the names of the parties, the children or the witnesses, as was stated in Re B (A Child)(Disclosure). [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
The court’s approach is to apply the familiar balancing exercise described in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593; see, e.g., Re Al Maktoum (Reporting Restrictions Order) [2020] EWHC 702 (Fam); [2020] EMLR 17. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 5:05 am
It’s that the distinction between who you’re allowed to punch and who you’re not is untenable. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
S12 AJA 1960 continues to apply even after proceedings have finished. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am
Mostyn J considers s12 Administration of Justice Act 1960 (AJA), and makes the point that this all fits with his new theory. s12 AJA is the piece of law that regulates what can and can’t be reported in cases about children where the court is sitting in private (and other sorts of cases we are not concerned with here). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
While you're there, consider adding a law firm link too. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:45 am
A journalist / publisher does have to adhere to s12 AJA 1960 which prohibits publication of ‘information relating to’ children act proceedings heard in private (even if a lawyer is confident nobody will mind and they re therefore effectively exempt), but reporters don’t have the added layer of a specific duty of confidentiality or other ‘best interests’ duties to a client who is a party to those proceedings. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 2:24 pm
Some parents of young children would agree with the idea that a newborn baby could not be identifiable from a video or photo (Re J). [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:33 pm
Silahkan pake KMSpico aja ya. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
In March 2004 Kent County Council, Re B (A Child) v the Mother & Ors [2004] EWHC 411 (Fam), Sir James Munby set out the classic exposition of the court’s ability to relax or restrain publication via the inherent jurisdiction. [read post]
