Search for: "In Re Adoption of Baby C." Results 1 - 20 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The ICWA established certain placement preferences for Indian children who, as in the case of In re Baby Boy C., are no longer in their parents’ custody. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
If you don’t want to take another baby home, the adoption option allows you to avoid taking another baby home. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
  In the case, known as In Re Baby Z, the court also concluded that 1) the application for the adoption of Baby Z. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am by resistance
Short synopsis of previous story:  Couple adopts a baby from China. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am by resistance
Short synopsis of previous story:  Couple adopts a baby from China. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” Further, §1915(c) allows the “Indian child’s tribe” to “establish a different order of preference by resolution. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm by familoo
It is not an adoption order. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
When asked to characterize the meeting, she concluded--'He persuaded me to give the baby up.' She returned to the attorney's office and from there to the court where she re-swore to Exhibit 8 (Affidavit of Natural Parent) and re-acknowledged Exhibit 7 (Agreement of Adoption and Irrevocable Consent) before the surrogate. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Oklahoma in its code and in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[28] and South Dakota in the case of Matter of Adoption of Baade[29]. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Here’s an excerpt from the blog: The SEC’s adopting release does not, however, address the shortening of the T+4 settlement standard currently in place for certain firm commitment offerings under the exemption in Rule 15c6-1(c), as previously discussed in our prior posting (available here). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm by Lucy Reed
If you wanted to feed the “adoption targets” / “babies for sale” conspiracy theories this would be a good starting point. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:20 pm
And they’re expensive — it's estimated that unnecessary early C-sections increase health-care costs by as much as $1 billion every year. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:37 pm by Maria Hook
Unless the foreign judgment is capable of recognition in New Zealand, the only way for the intending parents to become the child’s legal parents in New Zealand is to apply for adoption (see, eg, Re Cobain [2015] NZFC 4072, Re Clifford [2016] NZFC 1666, Re Henwood [2015] NZFC 1541, Re Reynard [2014] NZFC 7652, Re Kennedy [2014] NZFLR 367, Re W [2019] NZFC 2482, Re C [2019] NZFC 1629). [read post]