Search for: "In Re Adoption of Baby C."
Results 81 - 100
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2021, 1:21 am
You’re a…and that was 17 years ago. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:21 am
You’re a…and that was 17 years ago. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
In that case, the United States Supreme Court dealt with the status of twin babies who were born out of wedlock to parents who both were enrolled members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians (Tribe) as well as residents and domiciliaries of the Choctaw Reservation.[16] On January 10, 1986, the twins’ mother deliberately gave birth to the twins in a county some 200 miles from the reservation and executed a consent-to-adoption form in that same… [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:29 pm
Amir C. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
One of the ideas that’s being championed is this concept of what’s known as an EPIC retirement, E‑P‑I‑C. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
A 2014 paper by Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page has a neat chart showing the effects on the probability of a policy’s being adopted changes as support for it rises among (a) average citizens, (b) economic elites, and (c) organized interest groups.For (a), the general public, the line is flat – rising public support for a proposal from 0 towards 100% has almost no effect whatsoever on the likelihood of adoption. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Nipple wasn’t showing (which suggests uncertainty about what should happen if the baby’s latch were different/the woman’s nipple were larger). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
(Let’s put aside, for the moment, the new technology that allows the nucleus of one fertilized egg to be replaced with the nucleus from another fertilized egg as a means to avoid passing mitochondrial disease to the baby—and which has, so far, produced one actual baby.) [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:15 am
And they're all victims. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:57 pm
And the question of whether or not you're going to impute that to the corporation and take down the corporation as well as largely a discretionary call by prosecutors. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:01 am
That means saying "no" to the "drill, baby, drill /frack, baby, frack/ pipe, baby, pipe" crowds. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:54 am
See Adam Wagner’s post McCarthy v United Kingdom (Case C? [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 12:08 pm
Legal barriers: bars on reverse engineering, research: anticircumvention laws; requirement that you aver ownership in good faith (so you can’t test the operation of the system); user-generated barriers b/c users tend not to send the counternotices b/c the wording of a notice is so scary. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 5:23 am
Adoption Credit. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:45 am
My guess, however, is that New York City is a union town with a planner's mentality and too many red diaper babies-turned-Brownstoner ever to adopt such a rational solution. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:16 am
Civil Code §1365(C). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 12:51 pm
And if you think you're too busy, reexamine your priorities and see why you're really putting this off. [read post]
