Search for: "In Re Adoption of Children by D"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
Because adoption is not common here, most of these children are here until they grow up and leave, which is not necessarily at age 18. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
Because adoption is not common here, most of these children are here until they grow up and leave, which is not necessarily at age 18. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:30 pm
You’re looking on websites and you can see the number of adopters going up and the number of children staying the same. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:57 am
The Court of Appeals agreed that the Petitioners in these cases, who similarly lacked any biological or adoptive connection to the children, should have standing to seek custody and visitation pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 70 (a) in light of more recently delineated legal principles, which required it to conclude that that definition of "parent" established by it in Alison D. has become unworkable when applied to increasingly varied familial… [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
In Alison D. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
Because adoption is not common here, most of these children are here until they grow up and leave, which is not necessarily at age 18. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 4:58 am
"We'd like to be able to go back and bring them back and show them where they're from," Cleary said.As the program has grown, so has the close network the adoptive families have built for each other. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:51 am
How'd that work out? [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
They are more often denied adoption, and women with disabilities may be denied fertility treatments. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:54 pm
I'd love it if you share pictures of your kids in comments -- kinda like virtual "wallet-whipping-out". [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 10:50 am
If this feels like circular reasoning, I’d argue that it is. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:08 pm
And if you're not getting adopted as a baby, what are the chances that someone's going to adopt a kid with serious disabilities once he's double digits? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
” In re Adoption of Holland, 965 So.2d 1213, 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (citing § 63.042(1), Fla. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:03 am
We're sure that those children are harmed. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 7:42 pm
DRL § 115-d. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:24 pm
DRL § 115-d. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm
” In re the Adoption of Child by W.P. and M.P., 163 N.J. 158, 169 (2000). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:00 pm
Written by Craig D. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:19 am
In the case of Re E (A Child) ([2014] Fam 6) the President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, returned to the vexed question of reporting restrictions in children cases. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am
Svenningsen already had five biological children, plus the first child she’d adopted from China, Emily. [read post]
