Search for: "In Re Advisory Opinion"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Attorney–Client Privilege In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
We are discussing the Chancery Court's opinion in In re Loral. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
In re: Atheros Communications: Disclosure Relating to Financial Advisor Fees and Analyses From Kevin Miller of Alston & Bird, a member of our Advisory Board: On March 4th, the Delaware Chancery Court (VC Noble) issued an injunction prohibiting Atheros from holding a meeting of its stockholders to vote upon a merger agreement with Qualcomm pursuant to which Atheros would be acquired by Qualcomm for $3.1 billion in cash in In re: Atheros Communications. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:55 pm
The Alaska Legislative Ethics Committee has issued an advisory opinion allowing incumbent legislators to sign pre-election pledges during re-election campaigns. [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:10 am
(f/k/a Trust Advisory Services, Ltd.), Defendants (Opinion, United States Di... [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
In re United States, No. 14-70486 (M. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:51 am
OPINION NO. 01 - 2024 RE: Propriety of a circuit court judge’s involvement in adult child’s political campaign. [read post]
13 May 2022, 3:44 am
In its recent advisory opinion in Reference re Impact Assessment Act,[1] a 4-1 majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal concluded that the federal Impact Assessment Act (the “IAA”) and the Physical Activities Regulations (together, the “Assessment Regime”) are unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:01 am
By Dov Jacobs I just posted a longish comment on Spreading the jam on the ICJ advisory opinion that considered that the declaration of independence by the members of the assembly acting in their personal capacity, was not contrary to general international law or the lex specialis of SC Res. 1244. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:34 am
A new judicial ethics opinion from South Carolina: ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT RE: Propriety of a family court judge serving as a “tie-breaker” for friend if the co-trustees/co-executors cannot agree on an issue. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:18 am
From the South Carolina Advisory Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct: OPINION NO. 10 - 2012 RE: Propriety of a full-time magistrate trying criminal cases where the magistrate’s spouse is the head victim’s advocate for the Solicitor’s office. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:32 am
From the South Carolina Advisory Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct OPINION NO. 3-2015 RE: Propriety of a full-time magistrate presiding over a case in which the Sheriff’s Deputy acting as the prosecuting officer is also the cousin of magistrate’s... [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:31 am
Patent & Trademark Office’s Trademark Public Advisory Committee will be holding a public meeting to discuss, among other things, the impact that the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in the In re Bose Corp. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:50 am
N.J. 240, 255 (1950) In re Opin. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
Today, the New Jersey Supreme Court, in In re Election Law Enforcement Commission Advisory Opinion No. 01-2008, held that public officials cannot use campaign funds to cover the costs of a defense to a federal criminal indictment because payments in defense of federal criminal corruption charges are not “ordinary and necessary expenses of holding public office. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
FDA considers a committee’s advice and recommendations when deciding; in this case the advisory committee’s opinion was based on the FDA’s 89-page review. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:44 am
The South Carolina Advisory Committee on Standards of Professional Conduct issued an advisoty opinion "RE: Propriety of a magistrate judge being a member of a social networking site such as Facebook. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 8:58 pm
More: http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2012/09/the-florida-judicial-ethics-advisory-committee-has-a-recent-opinion-on-the-ethics-of-a-judge-testidfying-as-an-expert-when-re-1.html [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:03 am
Justice Sotomayor, in writing the majority opinion for the high court, rejected the argument that sentencing guidelines are advisory and don’t’ have the effect of increasing sentences later. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
”[6] Such an award, in the court’s opinion, would constitute an unjustified windfall. [read post]
