Search for: "In Re Ainsworth" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Ainsworth therefore has a defence to the copyright infringement claims, and will be able to continue selling his helmets in the UK, although not in the US. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:52 am by Michael Fitzgibbon
Ainsworth Technologies Inc., 2001 SCC 44 (CanLII), 2001 SCC 44 (Can Lll):The law rightly seeks a finality to litigation. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Laku, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1745 (16 July 2008) Wilson, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1754 (15 July 2008) Sivaraman, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1736 (24 July 2008) Islam, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 (31 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perry & Anor v Harris (A Minor) [2008] EWCA Civ 907 (31 July 2008) Jirehouse Capital & Anor v Beller & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 908 (30 July 2008) Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Ainsworth therefore has a defence to the copyright infringement claims, and will be able to continue selling his helmets in the UK, although not in the US. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:09 am by Gareth
  Since the Opinion itself is not available in English, we’re having to make do with the Press Release for the time being. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court Minnesota: Res judicata bars patent claims that could have been asserted in earlier trademark case involving the ‘Same technology and the same accused products’: Superior Industries, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
The action involves determining (among other things) (i) whether the copyrights re-vested in Taylor and Barry; (ii) whether clause 18(a) bound the claimant as assignee of the copyrights and (iii) whether Taylor and Barry had lost any right to reversion of the copyrights through waiver, acquiescence or estoppel.The main question before Mann J in these proceedings whether Taylor and Barry were correct in saying that there had been breach of clause 18(a). [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 11:50 am by charonqc
  Tom Harris MP says that Ainsworth doesn’t know the date and asks why we are so interested in conspiracy theories. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
– In re Ridgefield Farm LLC (TTABlog) TTAB dismisses HOT POCKETS 2(d) opposition due to weakness of POCKETS formative (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Star Wars producer Lucasfilm fails to win damages over unauthorised replicas of stormtrooper helmets - EWCA decision in Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (1709 Copyright Blog) (Trademark Blog) (Class 99) USPTO releases patent pendency simulation tool - Patent Pendency… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps P22 – Font used in Harry Potter merchandise could spell damage award (IP Osgoode)   US Trademarks Another big IP auction scheduled for September, but this time it’s not patents (IAM) New Mexico chile legislation shows power of certification mark (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (IPKat)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 18: TTAB denies motion to re-open testimony period,… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps P22 – Font used in Harry Potter merchandise could spell damage award (IP Osgoode)   US Trademarks Another big IP auction scheduled for September, but this time it’s not patents (IAM) New Mexico chile legislation shows power of certification mark (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (IPKat)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 18: TTAB denies motion to re-open testimony period,… [read post]