Search for: "In Re Anonymous"
Results 61 - 80
of 6,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2013, 9:43 am
Show Notes About the Hosts Jonathan Bailey Jonathan Bailey (@plagiarismtoday) is the Webmaster and author of Plagiarism Today (Hint: You’re there now) and works as a copyright and plagiarism consultant. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:51 pm
But it means that a would-be-claimant who files a pre-action application for anonymity in accordance with the procedure established in CVB v MGN Ltd is likely to find their filing (but not the application itself) rejected, with an instruction to re-file the application with a claim form. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
For now, we’re excited that the Sixth Circuit strengthened protections for anonymous speakers and we remain hopeful that our concerns about the decision won’t be realized. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm
" Members of FreeAnons help arrested anons in various ways, from sending them care packages while they're in jail to sending a volunteer to court to monitor their case. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 7:38 am
One of the issues seems to be that everybody thinks we're bluffing. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:19 am
Maybe you're happy to use your real name with your bank colleagues, but delight in the anonymity of a large nightclub. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:52 pm
Because it had no way to access the uncoded information, the consulting firm could not re-identify the information as both a legal and practical matter. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
” Maybe that’s why we’re not-so-pro-choice here. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:26 pm
As an employer, you’re taking a chance when you hire someone. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
In re Anonymous Online Speakers, 661 F.3d 1168 (U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is In re Gianasso (N.D. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:37 pm
Relatedly, the court rejected an argument by Andra that the statute of limitations should have been extended because the reviews were technically re-published each time a new Glassdoor user viewed the supposedly offensive content. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:10 pm
That’s why we’re watching this case closely, and we’re prepared to advocate for the First Amendment rights of the list’s anonymous contributors. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 12:57 pm
We’re dealing with public money. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:31 am
They’re not anonymous. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:45 pm
Instead, we’re worried about something else: that the court’s ruling, if affirmed by the Second Circuit, will be used in other trademark cases to minimize the interests of speakers who use trademarks as part of their commentary. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:09 pm
There’s hardly a better example of that than the case we’re discussing this week, in which financial disclosure requirements for nonprofits are running up against anonymous speech and association. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:37 am
You see the potential, for harm, embarrassment, harassment and abuse, we're quite sure. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:27 pm
Today, Joe Calandrino, Ed Felten and I are releasing a new result regarding the anonymity of fill-in-the-bubble forms. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:27 pm
Today, Joe Calandrino, Ed Felten and I are releasing a new result regarding the anonymity of fill-in-the-bubble forms. [read post]
