Search for: "In Re Apple Computer Securities Litigation."
Results 1 - 20
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
case=17290609987961065746&q=IN+RE+IPHONE+APPLICATION+LITIG&hl=en&as_sdt=2,36.) [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
We're glad that Apple has promised to change this practice. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:26 am
To be sure, Apple initially secured a complete ban on Galaxy Nexus sales (Opp. 12 n.8), but Samsung does not deny that it could have attempted to remove the infringing features and then applied for a modification of the injunction. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
Apple has zero governmental backing, unimpressive academic support compared to Epic, and when it comes to companies and industry bodies, we're practically talking about Apple applauding itself through astroturfing, Google indirectly backing Apple, and Roblox, which is increasingly controversial over its own treatment of creators. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:31 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] In re iPhone Application Litigation, 2011 WL 4403963 (N.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 11:51 pm
Apple: who's the dadvsi? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:37 am
That’s why we’re an Apple office and why more and more lawyers are now fully onboard with Apple. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:56 pm
In Kinsey, the court quoted a case from the Northern District of California, In re Apple Computer, Inc., 243 F. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 10:36 am
In an amicus brief—authored by EFF and joined by 46 computer scientists, security experts, and mathematicians including the inventors of modern cryptography—we told the court that forcing Apple to create and digitally sign a custom version of iOS that disables key security features would violate the First Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Proponents:Matthew Green, Information Security Institute, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins UniversityResearch in area of computer security and applied cryptography. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:05 pm
We're just a few days away from Apple announcing new products. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:35 am
The decision is In re iPhone Application Litig., CCH Privacy Law in Marketing ¶60,775.Further details regarding CCH Privacy Law in Marketing appears here. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
§ 1651(a), requiring the iPad's manufacturer, Apple Inc., to assist the FBI in bypassing the iPad's passcode lock and other security measures. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 1:15 pm
While the court declined to determine whether the agreements were an absolute bar to the users’ claims, it noted that there is always a meaningful choice when a challenged term in a contract involves nonessential recreational activities—forgoing the activity.The decision is In re iPhone Application Litigation, CCH Guide to Computer Law ¶50,268. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
-> BREAKING: Aereo Can't Use Compulsory License, Judge Says http://t.co/kmMDBC5OgV -> Carmakers ignore hacking risk, security expert says http://t.co/4IcgwZPRv2 -> Google claims it installed unbreakable encryption after NSA spying http://t.co/cR06xtPXZs -> Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation: An Advantage for Cloud Computing? [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
That may make it harder for Apple to score points with its security and privacy pretexts. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:31 pm
Is a "server" a separate computer or could it just be a subroutine of a computer program (Apple's "quick links" patent)? [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 12:47 pm
Controls access and maintains uniform security standards. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Customer Data Security breach Litigation, D.Nev. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
COM, US 10 Cirhttp://t.co/LTu8EErGLq -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-07-19: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-07-18: Microsoft … http://t.co/qOzmRKaziG -> [read post]
