Search for: "In Re Application Of" X""
Results 181 - 200
of 1,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2017, 3:32 pm
A notice might have discouraged reproductions and the whole point of these 8 x 10 glossies was to get publicity. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:51 am
Because the average screen resolution size is now 1366 x 788 or higher, which far surpasses the average screen size in 2009 of 1024 x 768. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:09 am
The applicant did so, but redacted some information. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 6:26 pm
If this sounds like it was written by the Patent Office itself, you're right. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:37 am
This Kat asks therefore, whether the formal drawings requirements deserve a re-think. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 2:07 pm
There is no indication that Figure 1 was drawn to any particular scale, much less one where the distance between the "X" and the outer end of the urethra is exactly 1.5 cm. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
It is expected that the Copyright Office will provisionally accept FilmOn X’s application, but will decline to issue the license at this time subject to “further regulatory judicial developments. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:39 pm
Be it public utility, roads, schools, houses, or commercial project, people want to know what you're doing, why you're doing it, and how it will affect them. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:15 am
You're listening to Episode #135 on Tuesday, November 4th, 2008. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Le père a présenté une demande en habeas corpus, faisant valoir que la mère détenait X sans droit. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
The full proposed decision may be viewed here: CPUC Proposed Decision re Energy Storage [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
If you're happy with those conditions, you can access the presentation in PDF format here. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:20 am
I have been practicing since the past X years and have also seen the Patel Nagar days but I feel, we have not improved in the real sense. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:25 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal in the case of Re X. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
The claimed structure was in error, due to a re-arrangement taking place unbeknownst to the inventors. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 8:00 am
It should be noted that the evidential burden on the applicant for re-establishment remains the same and the applicant still needs to show that all due care has been taken. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
With decision of 13 November 2014, the German Federal Patent Court declared all claims (and auxiliary claims) invalid for lack of inventive step starting from the German published examined application ("Auslegeschrift") DE 1 085 173 of 1954 in combination with US 2,440,393 of 1948. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 11:45 pm
The boy, X, lived with them in the US. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 12:56 am
En application de l'approche problème-solution, la question est de savoir s'il existait un enseignement dans l'état de la technique qui aurait incité l'homme du métier confronté au problème technique en question à utiliser X comme coupleur.Le document D8 divulguait des compositions de… [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
For a FREE, NO-OBLIGATION consultation to discuss your claims, call us at 952-345-2052 X.102, or click here to send us an email to schedule a time to speak with Jen or Ron. [read post]
