Search for: "In Re Application Of" X""
Results 201 - 220
of 1,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
Ten years ago, Generations X and Y were a growing minority of the jury pool. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:19 am
The approach to that balancing exercise was set out by the House of Lords in In re S (A Child)(Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:39 pm
Augier is a product lab using AI to build commercial applications for legal. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:04 pm
The Telegraph and Daily Mail seemed to just copy The Suns errors in reporting Re X, Y and Z (Disclosure to the security service): the full blog is here. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
If the debate on a particular topic had been closed without announcement of a decision on the matter, the board has discretion over whether or not it re-opens the debate and over the extent to which it does so (see Reasons, point 3.1).3. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:02 pm
The applicant even expressly requested that “the subject-matter of the present claims be re-examined taking into account the following explanations”. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 3:34 pm
Anyway, my out of office is on and the kiddies are off school and we’re all counting down until the fat man arrives…And I am a lady of leisure. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The previous application must also refer to th [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
App’x 516 (Fed. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:01 pm
X-Posted: Concurring Opinions. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:40 am
If you're a 1L you're not expected to have taken bankruptcy law courses. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am
USITC applications will not be updated until appropriations are allocated. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
They generally follow the same narrative arch: “I paid X amount of dollars and the lawyer did nothing for me. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
A substantial role was also given to NCAS – particularly with an eye to avoiding unnecessary suspensions and dismissals when re-training would be a better solution. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:36 am
App’x at 884. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
Also, get used to ctrl+z (undo), ctrl+s (save), ctrl+a (select all), and ctrl+x (cut). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:28 pm
You’re going to watch the Big — I mean, the Super Bowl. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:17 am
(d) Claim 3 of auxiliary request X comprised the feature "a push button movably arranged in the operation switch", which, contrary to the view of the Opposition Division, did not extend beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 11:44 am
If you’re running the CPK in OS X 10.4, you may get fed up and decide to quit. [read post]
