Search for: "In Re Application Of" X""
Results 161 - 180
of 1,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2021, 2:09 am
A company can easily verify whether an applicant is a licensed engineer, but it’s harder to confirm whether the person works well with others. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:38 am
The Court also issued an order directing the Department of Human Services to answer the application for leave to appeal in In re CW, BW, and DW Minors, Case No. 140841. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:17 am
For more on how these trademark confusingly similar factors apply in a trademark analysis, see In Re Application of E.I. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
” question) will also need to be sorted out.Article 55: Nine months to re-filePending applications will not be cloned, but there will be a nine month re-filing period following the end of the transition period. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
“We’re living in a golden age of First Amendment opportunism,” said Wu, speaking Friday at a Penn Law School conference titled “The Evolving Internet. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
When the People re-spoke the provision, they re-conferred the already-extant right to X, but nothing about the re-speaking repealed the earlier understanding, which also included Y. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 10:34 am
A sort of (entirely unreliable and made up) urban dictionary of legal latin… Inter alia – what goes on tour stays on tour Res ipsa loquitor – I lost my keys Pro bono – your argument was the dogs b***ks Pro se – professional speaker Mar a lago – I deny everything and plead the fifth Ad idem – by my calculation… Bona fide – good dog Certiorari – absolutely sure, your honour A posteriori – talking out of one’s backside… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:42 am
See also this post (asking whether you’d go to Notre Dame, for $X, or a lower-ranked school, for some number lower than $X).In these discussions, the question of value looms large. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:33 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Woodward v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 2167 (QB) (01 August 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander Ltd, Re: the Insolvency Act 1986 [2012] EWHC 2235 (Ch) (31 July 2012) E.ON UK Plc v Gilesports Ltd [2012] EWHC 2172 (Ch) (31 July 2012) Fine & Country Ltd & Ors v Okotoks Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 2230 (Ch) (31 July 2012) Quick Draw LP v Global Live Events LLP & Ors [2012] EWHC 2105 (Ch)… [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
Suppose General Convention enacted a resolution that purported to authorize, "for trial use, in accordance with Article X of the Constitution and Canon II.3.6" (exactly as it did in the case of 2018 Res. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
Suppose General Convention enacted a resolution that purported to authorize, "for trial use, in accordance with Article X of the Constitution and Canon II.3.6" (exactly as it did in the case of 2018 Res. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:45 pm
So now we're up to ten total calls. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
The BBC alleged that X is a dangerous extremist and misogynist, who abused two former female partners and used his connection to MI5 to terrorise and control one; and that MI5 should have known and cut ties with X. [read post]
14 May 2023, 2:31 pm
They get exactly one shot to try one of them, right around the real x-date. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 11:19 pm
The teeth will be cleaned and polished, followed by the application of a fluoride solution. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 3:44 am
(X (Re), 2014 FCA 249) I wrote about the decision under appeal here: Canadian intelligence agencies lied to obtain warrants, Federal Court judge says. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
He also noted that this approach has the benefit of easy application in many cases. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
One administrative, non-substantive change the new owner would need to make is to announce the re-location of the regulations to that agency’s segment of the Code of Federal Regulations. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 3:32 pm
A notice might have discouraged reproductions and the whole point of these 8 x 10 glossies was to get publicity. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:51 am
Because the average screen resolution size is now 1366 x 788 or higher, which far surpasses the average screen size in 2009 of 1024 x 768. [read post]
