Search for: "In Re Application of US for an Order"
Results 101 - 120
of 15,052
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2011, 10:15 am
The Court remanded In re Parole of Michelle Elias and People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:28 pm
If you’re sole issue is finances then about 3 courts will require a mediation before temporary orders for residents of Sugar Land Texas . [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:54 am
In order to register, the applicant must have first been granted a patent in Singapore. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:54 am
In order to register, the applicant must have first been granted a patent in Singapore. [read post]
24 Mar 2005, 10:31 am
[JURIST] AP is reporting that the US Supreme Court has just refused to issue an emergency stay in the Schiavo case, and will not order re-insertion of her feeding tube. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
See Order, In re Aiken County, No. 11-1271 (D.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:31 pm
Read and re-read the requirements and have someone else review it for errors or omissions. 7. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:34 am
" If the mark is "used in rendering the identified services," the specimen "need not explicitly refer to those services in order to establish the requisite direct association between the mark and the services. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:54 am
To learn more about how NSLs work and why we're fighting them, check out our FAQ. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:24 am
The General Court dealt with the issue in the Pelikan case (T-136/11) where it was stated that re-filing can constitute bad faith where the purpose of the repeat application is to artificially extend the grace period for non-use of an earlier EUTM in order to avoid the loss of a right as a result of non-use. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:35 pm
If you need us, send us a Contact Form, or better yet give us a call, and we’d be glad to provide you a free initial consultation. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 10:08 am
In re Chu, 66 F.3d 292, 296–97 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:51 am
In re Quantum Foods, Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1375 (TTAB 2010) [precedential]. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
In re R & B Receivables Management, Inc., Serial No. 77855168 (September 23, 2011) [not precedential].Applicant requested that, if the Board should find the specimen unacceptable, Applicant be allowed to amend the application to a Section 1(b) intent-to-use basis. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:45 am
See also In re Brown Jordan Co. 219 USPQ 375, 376 (TTAB 1983) (the fact that mark is not stamped on tags affixed to the goods until after order is received is not prohibited).And so, the Board reversed the refusal. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm
When codified, the Rules of Evidence incorporated those common law applications of res gestae in the rule specifically addressing bad acts evidence. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:04 am
Applicant agreed to expressly withdraw its pending application and to not oppose or challenge Opposer’s application or registration for the mark CEDAR COVE for use with bed and breakfast inn services. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:17 am
In re United States for an Order: Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register and Trap and Trace Device, 2010 U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:58 am
If you simply cite to the holding and use some quotes, you're essentially asking the Board to do the analysis for you. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 2:25 pm
If you simply cite to the holding and use some quotes, you're essentially asking the Board to do the analysis for you. [read post]
